Posted on 07/17/2024 10:14:31 PM PDT by John Robinson
We know the FBI develops "domestic terrorists" with the intent of capturing them in the act, to give themselves a great big pat on the back, push the "rightwing extremism" narrative ("but the shooter was Republican!"), and to justify budget increases.
Let's say the FBI was grooming this kid. They didn't intend for an assassination. But, of course, government is incompetent so it got away from them. (See Fast and Furious, et al.)
Now, let's assume this scheme was passed along outside and upwards of the agency, to somebody with great power, enough to influence choices within multiple agencies, or even only the USSS. If somebody knew the FBI was hatching a scheme, and because we only needed to rely on malicious compliance to get the desired kill shot, it would be pretty easy for just one or few individuals to ensure the Grade F (JB) team who hated Trump would be assigned this particular task.
That's one or very few people required to possibly effect an assassination.
To explain things like shorting DJT, that could simply be an act of insider knowledge to influence a trade, could be sourced from within the Crooks grooming FBI, or somebody who noticed a brewing flustercluck of an assignment in Trump's security detail, who also is aware of the tinderbox of a political environment currently. Actually, it seems a tipoff to an intentional weakened security detail could have alerted many others (photogs, camera crew, etc.) to take a special interest in this Butler event.
I don't buy anything these agencies say, they gaslight us profusely. But I can't do these all-encompassing conspiracy theories involving dozens if not hundreds of people. That's not how the world works. Just a few rogue people with the right knowledge and evil intention is all that is necessary. Maybe it's just two lovers texting about insurance policies?
Does this idea hold water?
Was there a muzzle flash from the counter-snipers on the roof behind Trump?
I don’t know much about guns and rifles.
Yes, I remember that being reported. Heck, Adam Schiff can lie like crazy to the American public and it’s fine because Congress-critters have immunity.
We’re supposed to have FISA courts to make sure that intel people have to have good reasons for at least the searches they do. That’s supposed to hold them accountable without exposing info that would compromise their ability to catch the really bad people, we’re told. But we’ve seen that they lied to the FISA court to waste their time on people they already knew were NOT “really bad people”. And nothing happened to them.
When people or pollers (yeah, I realize they’re not supposed to be mutually exclusive. lol) ask me what my top issue is, for the last 14 years it has been the lawlessness of our own government. Until we get a handle on that, our foreign enemies need not bother destroying us since our domestic ones in our government offices are already doing a fine job of it.
Is there any way to know for sure when something is a digital artifact?
I don’t know enough either, I gave it a looksee and didn’t see anything immediately from counter-snipers, but they’re also in broad daylight, shaky video. The water tower is within shadows, pretty sure you’d see something. But, I’m telling you, it’s a digital artifact. I’d bet a steak on it.
Yeah, find the original source video, play around with color controls, brighten and contrast, you’ll end up seeing blobs—those blob areas were less uniform when the CCD camera picked them up, pixels get tossed in lossy compression, that’s how video compression works—by removing mostly redundant information.
Now, take that original video, recreate the process of crop and zoom, then reencode (probably with web quality params.) You should be able to tell things got a lot more uniform and/or distorted. Again, loss of information during compression.
It’s like a photocopy of a photocopy. Each iteration, progressively worse.
The whole thing is a convoluted mess. It’s a terrible thing when we don’t have an investigatory body we can trust to tell us the truth.
With all the video that was taken, hopefully there are other videos that could clarify some of the questions at least.
Reading comprehension is fundamental to civil online discourse. Please read my first paragraph again.
Then was some history of MK ultra and other government -developed programs.
Sorry. Reading too fast.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.