Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jack Smith formally appeals Trump classified documents dismissal
The Hill ^ | 7/17/24 | Ella Lee

Posted on 07/17/2024 6:56:54 PM PDT by Libloather

Special counsel Jack Smith has formally appealed a federal judge’s dismissal of criminal charges against former President Trump over his alleged mishandling of classified information after finding the prosecutor was unlawfully appointed.

Smith’s office filed a notice saying it would appeal Florida-based U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon’s ruling tossing out the 40 charges Trump faced to the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals.

The Trump-appointed judge on Monday ruled that Attorney General Merrick Garland did not have the authority to appoint a federal officer with the “kind of prosecutorial power wielded by Special Counsel Smith.”

“The bottom line is this: The Appointments Clause is a critical constitutional restriction stemming from the separation of powers, and it gives to Congress a considered role in determining the propriety of vesting appointment power for inferior officers,” Cannon wrote in a 93-page ruling.

“The Special Counsel’s position effectively usurps that important legislative authority, transferring it to a Head of Department, and in the process threatening the structural liberty inherent in the separation of powers.”

The ruling marked a major victory for Trump — the first time one of his four criminal cases has been dismissed entirely — and came on the heels of an attempted assassination of the former president. Trump said the dismissal should be seen as the “first step” toward “Uniting our Nation” following the failed effort to take his life, calling for his other cases to be dismissed.

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Health/Medicine; History; Local News
KEYWORDS: appeal; classified; documents; jacksmith; lawfare; smith
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
Since this dipstick is unlawfully appointed, how can he advance anything that isn't fraudulent? Lock him up.
1 posted on 07/17/2024 6:56:54 PM PDT by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Libloather

She should have continued the pocket veto approach


2 posted on 07/17/2024 6:58:54 PM PDT by wiseprince (Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

You think this weasel would be under whatever rock Hillary is hiding under.

In anycase, last gasps of lawfare. He is so far beneath Trump now. Jack Smith, I can’t wait to see him get smacked by Surpreme Court eventually.


3 posted on 07/17/2024 6:59:08 PM PDT by goodolemr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Should be interesting to see what the 11th circuit does with this. I’m thinking they take it and underscore her decision and off it goes to SCOTUS unless the DOJ decides it would be better not to appeal it any further.


4 posted on 07/17/2024 7:00:26 PM PDT by Pox (Eff You China. Buy American!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Since Judge Cannon brought up authority, shouldn’t the first order of business be deciding if he’s allowed?


5 posted on 07/17/2024 7:03:27 PM PDT by qaz123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

He can’t believe he was fired.

He’ll have to carried off in a straitjacket.


6 posted on 07/17/2024 7:04:03 PM PDT by Regulator (It's fraud, Jim)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

He has no standing.


7 posted on 07/17/2024 7:05:48 PM PDT by mass55th (“Courage is being scared to death, but saddling up anyway.” ― John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Exactly! Judge Cannon declared he has no standing.


8 posted on 07/17/2024 7:09:40 PM PDT by 7thOF7th (Righteousness is our cause and justice will prevail!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Who’s paying the bills on his appeal?

Can congress file suit fo claw back all the money his unauthorized lawfare attck p’d off?


9 posted on 07/17/2024 7:12:15 PM PDT by thinden (buckle up ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

I would think the only one having “standing” to file an appeal would be the AG Merrick Garland, not Smith, as Smith is not the one who made the unlawful appointment.


10 posted on 07/17/2024 7:24:20 PM PDT by 4Runner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Wouldn’t this be a W? This piece of lawfare designed to interfere with the election has been neutered, from that angle we’re unconcerned. Our strategic position is neutral wrt the appellate court, they may uphold the lower court which is fine, or they may overrule which likely takes this up to SCOTUS, which probably will take it, and will clarify the parameters for this type of prosecutorial position in our favor, which is the legally correct interpretation, afaik.


11 posted on 07/17/2024 7:25:58 PM PDT by John Robinson (🍺)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Think ahead, a few years into the future.

This question will eventually make its way to the Supreme Court.

The DOJ can hold off on it until one of the Justices retires, or otherwise becomes unable to continue.

At that point, PDJT 47 will have to nominate a new Justice, and that nomination will be sent to the Senate.

This will set up a huge battle, because the nominee will be ruling on the matter of Jack Smith’s legitimacy as a “special council.” That in turn could result in continuous federal trials for 47.

PDJT 47, of course, will not be allowed to interfere with the DOJ in any way. That would be “hampering prosecution,” or some such.

Result: all PDJT nominations to the Court would be stalled, maybe derailed.


12 posted on 07/17/2024 7:34:44 PM PDT by Steely Tom ([Voter Fraud] == [Civil War])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Imagine the 11th circuit telling Smith “no standing”...


13 posted on 07/17/2024 7:35:52 PM PDT by Tench_Coxe (The woke were surprised by the reaction to the Bud Light fiasco. May there be many more surprises)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Waste of taxpayer money, but maybe they will slap him down hard enough to cause the case in DC to be dismissed as well.


14 posted on 07/17/2024 7:38:09 PM PDT by Reno89519 (Trump / Vance 2024 - Make America Great Again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tench_Coxe

“Imagine the 11th circuit telling Smith “no standing”...“

I cannot. They have already ruled against Cannon once. Good chance it happens again IMHO.


15 posted on 07/17/2024 7:45:24 PM PDT by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

jack Smith should be forced to pay all of the defense attorney fees as well as triple damages


16 posted on 07/17/2024 7:55:46 PM PDT by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy - EVs a solution for which there is no problem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Cannon had a dozen other reason she could have dismissed. And a she could have gone after Smith and his team criminally as well for some of the garbage they have pulled.


17 posted on 07/17/2024 8:01:19 PM PDT by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mass55th

This


18 posted on 07/17/2024 8:01:59 PM PDT by I got the rope
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Should be dismissed due to Lack of Standing……. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣


19 posted on 07/17/2024 8:09:32 PM PDT by Lockbox (politicians, they all seemed like game show hosts to me.... Sting)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Good luck Jack. 🙄


20 posted on 07/17/2024 8:13:05 PM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson