Posted on 07/17/2024 2:23:08 PM PDT by rxsid
ππππ ππ: Video emerges suggesting there may have been a second shooter...
Are we witnessing another FBI coverup?
Credits: https://t.co/xax8TiBTrr pic.twitter.com/sVviEavqeqβ legislation (@legislationpage) July 17, 2024
multiple eyewitnesses ...
ππππ ππ: Multiple witnesses now coming forward backing up reports of a second shooter.
Developing... https://t.co/amupwuiABS pic.twitter.com/ubOwmGCMKDβ legislation (@legislationpage) July 17, 2024
“Where is it? Because I posted something from X for discussion, I have βfaithβ in the theory? Are you joking?”
You laughed at all prevailing reports except for the one you posted.
I just assume they were SS. There were pics of snipers on both roofs but this was all I could find in a quick search.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-rally-shooting-pennsylvania-gunman-snipers-location-maps/
Wrong.
I didn't "laugh" at anything. I posted a theory, and I'm asking questions here. Is that OK with you or is that verboten?
I questioned your post:
Already reported:1. The killer
2. Local LE miss
3. SS sniper kill
To which I asked a question:
Reported by who?
To which you replied:
whom:Media
Local PE
Secret Service
Attendees
To which I replied:
Media, Local PE and SS? Ok, so you put your trust in the media, trust in the local PE who at a minimum was massively incompetent and....the too-slopped-of-a-roof-30-minutes-later Secret Service? Your joking, right?Attendees are also saying there was someone on the water tower who was involved. They are discounted out of hand...just because?
To which you replied:
And you out your faith with somebody that draws two lines and plays a background song track ..
Which makes no sense whatsoever if you look at what I've posted in this thread. So why you would say I have "faith" in this guy's theory is nonsensical.
What do you think of the eyewitnesses who say they saw someone on the water tower who was involved?
“I didn’t “laugh” at anything. “
I stand corrected. You referred to me as a jokester for referring to reported scenarios other than the one you posted.
Geez. Get a grip man. I didn’t call you a jokester. I asked if you were joking. There’s a difference.
Thomas Crooks: Fireworks detonator found with Trump gunman after snipers shot him dead | US News https://t.co/CMcSfK64K0 pic.twitter.com/YCTK70KzGNβ πRSS NEWS UPDATE (@RSSNEWSUPDATE) July 18, 2024
Looking at the dead Crooks, does this confirm he was shot from the front (or some closely related angle)? Or the side (or some closely related angle)?
But they do want wild stories to grow and spread. The more and crazier the stories, the better for them. It provides smoke to help cover up what really happened. And when the crazy stories are debunked, it smears the people who are following the correct trail. Some of them will get discouraged and fall out of the hunt. Other voices will get drowned out by a manufactured consensus about a "lone wolf killer", and "we can never know what happened".
Or whatever the party narrative turns out to be.
“I asked if you were joking.”
You didn’t ask. Do you want me to repost what you said?
There's a question mark there. That's a question. "I asked if you were joking."
Aaahhhh, your punking me, right?
OK, here's a question (for the 3rd time): What do you think of the eyewitnesses who said someone on the water tower was involved?
“There’s a question mark there. That’s a question. “
LOL! We are all aware of that snarky tactic!
Odd how so many refuse to even consider looking deeper. While ridiculing anyone not swallowing the storyline released by the “media” and “government”.
There needs to be an analyst other than the FBI gathering the videos. I wouldn't trust the Democrat Party's secret state police to be able to do anything other than round up their political opponents.
The entry wound is just below the left eye. The exit wound is just behind his left ear.
The blood splatter looks like they rolled him to the left before the picture was taken. They were probably searching his pockets.
The TMX video looks like he slumped to the right when he was hit by the counter sniper(s).
Was he hit more than once? Maybe, but only once in the head.
They were dreaming it. Β There are real-time videos with nobody on the tower.
I laugh at grammar experts that don’t know the proper usage of “your” and “you’re” even after being cited for their error.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.