Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: EasySt

If the photo was really taken at 1/8000th of a second shutter speed, then the streak in the image had to include “mist”, as you mentioned, or the bullet’s shock wave vapors. A short (one inch or so) bullet traveling 2000 fps would leave only a 4” streak at that shutter speed.


1,561 posted on 07/18/2024 6:24:15 AM PDT by Tellurian (Any cleverness from a democrat is quickly invested in deception)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1519 | View Replies ]


To: Tellurian
If the photo was really taken at 1/8000th of a second shutter speed, then the streak in the image had to include “mist”, as you mentioned, or the bullet’s shock wave vapors. A short (one inch or so) bullet traveling 2000 fps would leave only a 4” streak at that shutter speed.

Since the streak appeared to be maybe 12-18" long, shutter speed was considerably less. Halving the shutter speed to 1/4000 would essentially make the streak 8 inches long at that particular bullet speed. I would venture to say that he was shooting in the 1/2000 to 1/2500 second range on such a nice sunny day, with the aperture at f/8 - kind of a middle-of-the-road aperture setting. ISO probably around 400 to allow for faster shutter speeds.

If you can get the original image file, the camera settings will be included in the EXIF information.

1,604 posted on 07/18/2024 8:50:59 AM PDT by meyer ("When, in the course of human events,....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1561 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson