Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Reno89519

Yes as it always should have been. Local control, local government regulations. People talk about the war between the States like it solved anything. All it did was prove that military might can force a large group of people to be subjects of an out of control Federal government. The current out of control fedzilla is directly the product of that conflict. Had the North let the South leave the Union would likely have been restored in a decade or less and we wouldn’t have a fed based tyranny but 50 sovereign states still. What California does locally is of no concern to Texans and those who want to make it a concern are from the same tyrannical fascist cloth as every other group that wants to control other people lives from afar for some ideological reason. All forms of that should be crushed with deadly force if need be. Texas for Texans and California for Californians that’s what our founders intended.


33 posted on 07/13/2024 1:41:11 AM PDT by GenXPolymath
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: GenXPolymath
A complication comes as to when life begins, e.g., conception. If a mother has the right to kill her baby prior to birth, then is it fair and right to charge someone else with injuring or killing the baby within that same period? Thus, if someone kills a pregnant woman, the only charge of murder is for killing the pregnant woman? I ask because it otherwise creates unequal application of the law or unequal rights--either it is legal to kill the baby or it is not. What about the doctor and accomplices killing the baby? Like I said, complicated.

Taken literally, a woman may have the right to kill her baby, but should that confer to the doctor?

35 posted on 07/13/2024 1:53:28 AM PDT by Reno89519 (I'll go out on a limb: Trump & Gabbard 2024 or Trump & Sanders 2024)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

To: GenXPolymath
Had the North let the South leave the Union would likely have been restored in a decade or less and we wouldn’t have a fed based tyranny but 50 sovereign states still. 

 

With all due respect, that is the most asinine remark I've read in a long time. 

In a decade or less, slavery and the national issues that they brought to the table would have gotten much worse. But perhaps you think that "in a decade or less" Southern states would have decided on your own that slavery was bad.

But lets bring your thought process to relate now with abortion. We've had 40 years of letting abortion fester and foster like slavery did. Do you think if we gave the States the right to decide if Roe v. Wade was wrong that they would do so?

Thank God Trump and the RNC weren't so blind 8 years ago when their national policy was to oppose abortion. We never would have gotten the Dobbs decision if they were.

Trump took 2 giants steps forward in that 3 good justices were appointed. Yet one step backwards in this decision to abandon and ignore this abortion issue.

97 posted on 07/13/2024 8:22:02 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd (A truth that's told with bad intent, Beats all the lies you can invent ~ Wm. Blake)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson