Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Starboard
Those who commit to strongly supporting the MAGA agenda and welcome accountability are definitely worth voting for, but those with track records of misleading voters are not IMO.

Such a recommendation fits nicely into primary election considerations (R v R) which precedes any November general election (R v D) but dodges the specific point in our exchange and is nonresponsive.

But I will answer your question:
why crawl through broken glass to vote for people who don’t have much, if any, respect for the will of their voters?
To keep a "Biden" supporter out of federal office, to add seats to the R chamber and to then have an opportunity to more effectively manage the wayward R.

55 posted on 07/11/2024 12:47:31 PM PDT by frog in a pot (If a state doesn't require U.S. citizenship of fed voters, it will have ignored existing fed law,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: frog in a pot

“but dodges the specific point in our exchange and is nonresponsive.”

**************

I don’t see how voting for an ostensible Republican who misleads voters, appeases Democrats, and dodges accountability can be perceived as a “gain”. And is it really ‘R v D’ when the R is a RINO? What’s the point of voting for anyone who doesn’t intend to fight?

Voting for (and effectively rewarding) backstabbers increases the number of your so-called “wayward R’s”, and there are already way too many of them in the GOP. I think you would even agree with that. And logic dictates that the more of them there are the harder they are to effectively manage.

You are dodging that issue my friend.


60 posted on 07/12/2024 7:46:45 AM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson