GIGO: Garbage In, Garbage Out.
NY Times has it 10 points higher for Trump.
What was the question/prompt to ChatGPT, precisely as submitted?
The AI was trained on a lot of old, bogus, and biased material. No different than asking 25 MSNBC hosts what they think.
Maybe in time as more pro-Trump info like today’s ruling is factored in, the AI outcome will be different.
ChatGPT is about the worst tool you can use for current analysis. It’s no better than a basic search engine at that point, since it doesn’t have that data in its LLM.
Only three places allow professional gamblers to bet on the election. The immense vast majority ban winners and/or have $100 limits iow are worthless.
I doubt any of their odds are listed on those links.
1)Pres Trump is $1.73 to win $1.00 with $50,000 limits
2)Pres Trump is $1.71 to win $1.00 with $2000 limits
3)Pres Trump is $1.56 to win $1.00 it is an exchange the limits are whatever is currently offered.
Did you ask it why is returned only 6 sites as sources?
Laz, you might find this thread of interest.
Unless ChatGPT takes into consideration the democrats’ penchant for election fraud, and election theft... the odds are all garbage.
Whatever. I used ChatGPT a couple of days ago. Needed a BASIC programming language script. Gave it w website address that showed the subset of the language that could be used and it kept using statements outside of that subset. Went round and round with it and at one point, it gave me back MicroPython to be used on a Raspberry Pico. wtf?
How can an AI computer, trained with the internet as a dataset, not know every programming language and also have poor reading comprehension?
I did notice it picked up a profile pic that I used once or twice several years ago and I’m sure it did so by way of my email address, so I wonder if it’s been programmed to offer junk answers to “far-right” people like me.