To: TheConservator
OK, so this tree is clearly on the property line and therefore the roots encroach into (under) the neighbors property. I'm sorry the tree is going to die, but I side with the neighbors.
5 posted on
06/30/2024 9:53:13 PM PDT by
Responsibility2nd
(A truth that’s told with bad intent, Beats all the lies you can invent ~ Wm. Blake)
To: Responsibility2nd
>> I’m sorry the tree is going to die, but I side with the neighbors.
But but but they have a LOVE sign in the window! Because progress! And it’s a TREE for pete’s sake! Sacred! Clearly the whinin... er, complaining neighbor is in the right, because wokeness!
(My goodness! Can you say ZERO LOT LINE? lol)
7 posted on
07/01/2024 2:59:45 AM PDT by
Nervous Tick
("First the Saturday people, then the Sunday people...": ISLAM is the problem!)
To: Responsibility2nd
In the picture, it appears that the existing house already wiped out 40% of possible rut space for the tree, so perhaps the existing homeowner should have torn down his house and restored his land once the neighboring lot was sold, so that the tree could live.
10 posted on
07/01/2024 4:18:48 AM PDT by
BobL
To: Responsibility2nd
OK, so this tree is clearly on the property line and therefore the roots encroach into (under) the neighbors property. I'm sorry the tree is going to die, but I side with the neighbors.Indeed. Either property rights mean something, or they don't.
22 posted on
07/01/2024 10:08:05 AM PDT by
zeugma
(Stop deluding yourself that America is still a free country.)
To: Responsibility2nd
#5 That looks like an old neighborhood. Look at the gray cement-asbestos? siding on the house on the right. I lived in a duplex with that siding. It was built in 1908.
The new building also destroys the view the neighbor had.
25 posted on
07/01/2024 6:38:05 PM PDT by
minnesota_bound
(Need more money to buy everything now)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson