[Alberta's Child]

U.S. Senators invariably make for awful leaders. I don’t trust this guy Vance any further than I can throw him.

And he doesn’t bring Trump a single vote that Trump doesn’t already have.

[McCarthysGhost]

I was just thinking the same thing. If The GOP let him be a Senator chances are he’s not the one we need.

[Chad C. Mulligan]

U.S. Senators invariably make for awful leaders. I don’t trust this guy Vance any further than I can throw him.

I sorta-kinda agree, which is why I want Trump to take him, because I don't want him representing me in the Senate. Vance is a phony, or to put the best face on it, naive on so many levels, most notably macroeconomics and foreign policy. He had his seat bought for him by Peter Thiel, and that's the only place where his loyalty lies. I too don't trust him any farther than I can throw a Buick. Supposedly pro-Trump, (he wasn't always), but the first thing he did when he landed in DC was to kiss McConnell's....aah....ring. The veep slot is perfect for him; he does good photo-ops, and he can be Trump's attack dog during the campaign. Once in office he is essentially powerless, and AFAIC that's a good thing.

[citizen]

U.S. Senators invariably make for awful leaders. I don’t trust this guy Vance any further than I can throw him.

---

That has long been my stance as well. US senators steeped in deal-making are generally unsuited for an executive position.

[old school]

I agree. Trump will win regardless of VP pick. In my opinion, he should pick someone who is very much like he was in 2016; a non-politician, citizen who seeks the best interests of the nation and its people, Kari Lake!