That honor goes to a basketball court, situated in the floor above.
Trump getting immunity however... That's another matter.
Brunson case?
It’s the case on Trumps immunity for sure. Nothing leaked out yet but the signs are there.
Those are not the fences that would be in place for serious issues, just minor crowd control.
I saw this on Twitter/X as well.
Speculation there was also about the Trump Immunity case.
I’m surprised the ruling didn’t leak weeks ago like the Dobbs case did.
Chevron is the one. It goes wrong and it’s over.
The Grants Pass case comes to mind.
The Supreme Court may finally put a stop to the Amendment IV violations Trump is enduring.
“secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures”
Having 30 FBI agents “ready to shoot to kill” barge into one’s home is unreasonable, even if the home is Trump-sized.
The FBI obviously needs to be down-sized.
There was something posted earlier that it was not true. To be honest I don’t know if it is or isn’t. it’s probably going to take someone that lives nearby to check it out
But the Libs say no one is above the law, if there really believed that then why the need for a fence?
That honor goes to a basketball court, situated in the floor above.
President Nixon could have been convicted.
Presidents don’t have more immunity than their subordinates such as Merrick Garland or Jack Smith.
Presidents do enjoy a rebuttable presumption that their actions were legal.
I don’t think the Supreme Court is currently fenced. The problem with fake news is that it goes both ways. Conservatives have to be extra careful these days about believing what we read, what we see, and even video that is presented. The left will use social media posts such as those circulating about the fencing at SCOTUS to discredit stories that ARE true.
The Democrats' words were inflammatory.
Trump's weren't.
Trump's base has for years been hardened against unceasing outrages.
Biden's base rarely loses so they will rage at every outrage.
Putting up fencing around the SCOTUS why?
Really, if they don’t give Trump immunity then Obama, Biden, Clinton, Bush, and all of the POTUS past have serious problems. Only someone with T.D.S. can’t see that. Further, the Biden administration broke the law by putting Jack Smith, who was never Senate confirmed as a US attorney, in charge. It’s a judicial nightmare, that needs to end. The former status quo was blown out of the water by Democrats to ‘get Trump’ and it has devolved to a need for SCOTUS to say the obvious.
Honestly, the Biden administration is essentially lawless at this point. The DOJ isn’t responsive to Congressional oversight anymore. The FBI spends its entire time doing political hatchet work for the Democrats. The DOJ, FBI, CIA, Homeland are just political front organizations for the Democrats at this point, and serve to cover for Joe and Hunter. They even go after whistleblowers who relay how corrupt it all is.
I am not to worried about the SCOTUS deciding the process about immunity for a POTUS who has already been found not guilty by the Senate for Jan 6th. I am
More concerned about the safety of the SCOTUS if they call out the lawlessness and unconstitutionality of what the Democrats and Joe Biden have already done. Then there will be riots by the left and death threats, just like Schumer once promised if they didn’t do what the democrats wanted.
Penguin 6 drove down there last night and walked around videoing the building. The street out front is closed to traffic but the only fencing is some low bicycle type fencing. You can basically still walk right up to the steps.
The bump stock decision made it clear that only Congress can make laws. Based on that decision, I am very confident that SCOTUS will Reverse the Chevron decision. It will be 6-3; maybe 5-4, but it will be reversed.
The same reasoning should also apply to the legality of the appointment of Jack Smith as a Special Counsel. Merritt Garland admitted there is no Special Counsel statute. He claimed there were regulations that allowed such an appointment. He was shut down when the Congressman pointed out that regulations are not laws.
I’m also pretty sure Trump will largely prevail on the immunity case. However, if the Court rules that Jack Smith was not constitutionally or properly appointed under a statute, the court could rule that way an then rule that the immunity issue is mute.
Yep. Heard about this yesterday. We all know exactly why the fences are going up. Its not about the Chevron Doctrine. I fully expect that to be overturned but the DC Swamp creatures would be unlikely to riot over that even though they’ll hate it. The same goes for the case about the feds leaning on social media to censor speech they don’t like. Its probably not even for the laughable Jan 6 claim against Trump under the 14th amendment. No.
We all know its for Trump vs United States. The SCOTUS will have no choice but to rule that a president must first be impeached for any official acts before every local prosecutor....and the US has 30,000 DAs....can prosecute him. Meaning the laughable NY case will be thrown out completely. Klantifa types will go ape feces over that. Talking heads on the Leftist propaganda outlets will lose their chit right on the air.
If they’re fencing, clearly is a decision that leans right. They wouldn’t be doing it if it was lefty ruling.