Posted on 06/14/2024 7:25:32 AM PDT by KierkegaardMAN
I think there was more than one shooter as well. The old man was a patsy. There is no way that he carried all the contents of the hotel room up by himself. An AR-15 with a bump stock doing magazine dumps is going to overheat the barrel quickly. It had to be a more substantial rifle built for sustained full-auto.
If you watch the complete video the first burst is one continuous burst of way more than 30 rounds. Later you can hear two different guns being fired at the same time.
I thought they found live rounds, shell casings, magazines - even a pistol lying on the ground around the concert venue. Some victims had bullet wounds with horizontal trajectories, suggesting they weren’t shot by someone firing downwards from the Mandalay Bay. Whatever happened, they’re lying to us about it.
Direct link to the decision itself:
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-976_e29g.pdf
It is fairly short as these things go.
To the best of my knowledge, no. Not at the Supreme Court level. The only case directly challenging section 922; is US vs. Miller, a case where the U.S. government lied to the court through omission of very pertinent facts regarding the use of sawed-off shotguns during WWI.
I think it is pretty clear at this point that the government was directly involved.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.