Posted on 06/13/2024 3:52:06 AM PDT by MtnClimber
Lawyers who agree with their clients — and disagree with Democrats — now face disbarment and even jail time.
About a year ago, I received a phone call from John Eastman, the prominent constitutional scholar. He was facing disbarment proceedings for the advice he had given President Trump, had read my book (Debunked), and wanted me to testify on his behalf at the forthcoming California disbarment trial. Of course, I was eager to testify because I believed (and still believe) that the six key swing state elections in 2020 were not certifiable. The specific reasons are laid out in the book.
Originally, I was one of seven “experts” selected by Eastman and his attorney, Randy Miller. As experts, we would be able to give our opinions regarding the integrity of the election. However, well financed attorneys for the California State Bar Association (SBA) immediately objected — to every witness. Most of the time, Judge Yvette Roland was eager to oblige the SBA.
In my case, Judge Roland ignored the fact that I was a veteran auditor and CPA, had written a comprehensive numbers-based book on the 2020 election, had written a book describing 23 ways we can improve our elections, and had published at least 25 articles on the subject. The problem? I “did not audit any of the state results for the 2020 election.” Her statement was correct: no state or county offered to let me inspect and audit its election. To my knowledge, however, no state or county has ever invited any outside CPA firm to perform such an audit. The closest we came was in 2021, when the Cyber Ninja audit was forced upon the highly reluctant and totally uncooperative Maricopa County, in Arizona.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
The marxists are feeling their oats.
They know they have to hide it and shut up any discussion of it.
Yes, they are. We are following the “Venezuelan model on moving to totalitarian rule.
They are trying to force a much larger scale Athens, TN event. They think the illegitimate government would win. And they might. But they might not.
They know they have to hide it and shut up any discussion of it.
____________________________________
It’s everywhere today - 2020 stolen election, the J-6 Pelosi production, sham Trump trials, Eastman’s prosecution - all Fascistic efforts to write or rewrite history to meet the Commie’s ‘ends justify the means ideology.’
Yet one more clause of the Bill of Rights under assault from the Democrats: the right to an attorney.
Yep.
.
This isn’t over. It was a civil rights violation under our Constitution and federal law. Existing federal law against this type of abuse needs to be strengthened — by the addition of frightening penalties.
They cannot let any form of truth slip out that questions their narrative that “2020 was the most secure election ever”.
Nothing has happened to anyone associated with this in ‘20. With that knowledge, why would it be any different this time? Until the offending leftists are dispatched with malice they will continue their offensive behavior.
It’s not only the judges. With the way the left has divided this nation, much as a black person could not get a fair trail in the old south, Trump, is supporters, or anyone he pays to help him could not get a fair trial in any of these liberal bastions. Judges, Proscutors, and Jurist in those areas have already made up their mind about them before they ever step in the courtroom.
They are using the full court press, since they already have plans to steal 2024, and are preemptively striking fear into any lawyers who would even think of contesting it.
Fried says the “judge” was smart.
She’s not. It doesn’t take any intelligence to simply deny all evidence from one side. Just malice.
Roland isn’t smart and her conclusions can’t hold up against rational review. The problem is that in California, there isn’t any “rational review” to be found: all judicial positions are occupied by Leftist ideologues like her.
The entire show trial was a set from the get. Eastman is an order of magnitude better then her, but he assumed that standard rules of evidence would be in place. As Gableman found out, the only rules in that courtroom was the rule of the jungle.
If Eastman has the time and money this will get to the SCOTUS, and undoubtedly reversed there. But it should not have to go that far. The fact that this trash can now disbar anyone from the other side using fatuous claims of attorney misconduct means that everyone on our side now has to worry about that: Brian Blehm in Arizona was just disbarred by another Leftist parrot in the Arizona Bar Association. On the upside, Sydney Powell was completely exonerated in Texas.
Roland is a dim witted ghetto bomber using dumbthug obstruction tactics. Outside of some Leftist urban areas she would be shredded as an attorney. She’s in her position precisely because she’s a complicit hack. But here in CA, there’s a whole “legal” system populated by trash like her.
“2020 was the most secure election ever”.
= = =
Their security is them using their lawfare.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.