The thing that most of us need to understand is that the Supreme Court rarely acts with haste. It takes its time. SCOTUS is not concerned with the fate of Donald Trump, per se. I think they could be motivated to step in, if they believe that some bedrock legal principle is being violated. There’s a lot of optimism that either the NY Supreme Court or Appeals Court could send this case back to the trial court based on multiple violations of law and judicial procedure by the trial judge. But if the appeal goes up from there, it’s not clear that SCOTUS would act unless it represents a clear case for them to protect a bedrock legal principle. That’s my two cents, anyway.
You can bet that the Judges who will oversee Appeals, the USSC Justices that are OWNED (5 of them), and everyone in between (including the Jurors), have all been made aware of the consequences of independent thinking otherwise, vs. the rewards of "going along with the Plan".
Offshore and hidden bank accounts are easily obtainable, along with guaranteed income streams from appearances, book deals, family "rewards", etc.
Those involved in trucking in the votes in 2020 need to be investigated COMPLETELY for their complicity in the Treason that was committed.
Federal Judges may be Appointed for life terms, but they should ALSO be subject to intentional malpractice Removal and prison sentences, and forfeiture of ALL accumulated earnings from the Crimes.
There weren't enough pre-emptory challenges available to the Defense, screening a Jury Pool that was "selected" from a Venue that was 90% biased against the defendant, to start with.