[grey_whiskers]

The reason for this, is that the woman thinks she has obligated the man to commitment (at her discretion to exercise the obligation, not his), by sleeping with him. Her rationalization would be some faint echo of the old "breach of promise" -- but in fact it is a sense out outraged equity or fairness: she has given him that which is requisite for marriage, her body (and affirmations sex, not "duty sex"), so it is only fair that he come up to snuff on his end of the bargain:commitment and a ring.

Little do the women realize the irony: women love to spit on the nice boys, the betas, "women are not a candy machine where you put in time and attention and love comes out" ..but they are treating the hawt Nan the same way: "hawt men and bad boys are a machine where you put in sex (which is a lot of fun anyway) and a ring comes out."

[grey_whiskers]

See my post just above this one.

[alexander_busek]

Her rationalization would be some faint echo of the old "breach of promise" -- but in fact it is a sense [of] outraged equity or fairness: she has given him that which is requisite for marriage, her body (and [affirmation] sex, not "duty sex"), so it is only fair that he come up to snuff on his end of the bargain: commitment and a ring.

An amazing observation! Very much like finding some vestige of an ancestral aquatic organ in a terrestrial animal!

Regards,