Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: alexander_busek; KC_Conspirator; FormerFRLurker; grey_whiskers
Response: We don't really know what those married men on AM were doing / seeking. Were they just "joy-riding" or maybe "testing the waters" or simply "assessing their market value?" Looking for a casual hook-up to allay the pain, frustration, and loneliness of an already sexless marriage? Seriously contemplating divorcing their spouses, and already on the look-out for a new mate? Or was their marriage effectively already a "marriage in name only?" Had the women already announced her desire to split? Were the men merely waiting for the divorce to be finalized? The hypergamous scenario you posit ("trading UP") is pure speculation. We simply don't know what they were up to.

What a BS weasel out answer.

They are on that site only to look for cheating on their wives.

Or maybe like with Playboy, they got it for the articles. (Yeah, right)

Response: Apex Fallacy mixed with Equivocation Fallacy! In essence: You are invalidly / deceptively saying "men" when "top 4% of all men" would be correct in one clause,

You can prove that number with stats I take it.

Or is that just a SWAG?

144 posted on 06/03/2024 12:10:28 PM PDT by metmom (He who testifies to these things says, “Surely I am coming soon.” Amen. Come, Lord Jesus…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies ]


To: metmom; alexander_busek; KC_Conspirator; FormerFRLurker; grey_whiskers
Saw this and couldn't resist...


145 posted on 06/03/2024 7:09:25 PM PDT by grey_whiskers ( The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson