Am I to assume the first was a lie, and the second post should be taken as true? Or do both really belong in the propaganda category as neither are known to be true, but are speculation to incite anti-Putin fever?
I could care less what Putin does to the rich in Russia, which in turn would affect him as well.
Russia soak the rich tax hikes stronk as bull!
Since stronk is slang for strong, should I just assume that you are admitting both posts lean heavily towards being BS & that you are posting only because you are nothing but a disruptor who is trying whip up anti-Russian/Putin sentiment, because perhaps you are even a Russian supporter?
If that is correct, then bless your honesty, finally.
But curious minds want to know:
Where has your boink gone to bouiker?
I guess you assume that your new response; Three days to Kharkiv, is an even more clever retort than boink was that preceded it?
If that is the case, both are stronk marcusmaximus fails bro!!!!!!!!!!🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣