The UN seems to have it's view of good and evil inverted from reality.
The eschatological culmination is determined by God and not man.
The believer is tasked to spread the gospel, not make the world a better place from which to enter Hell.
Properly understood, there is international law in the sense of the customs and treaties that govern conduct among nations. The UN though is a malignant entity that should be radically reformed or abolished entirely.
It’s rather ironic Ben Shapiro would be making these points after opposing an American First President for long as he did and after supporting the proxy war in Ukraine.
I highly doubt Benji Shapiro would be making this argument if we were back in 1945.
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CPRT-106SPRT66922/html/CPRT-106SPRT66922.htm
Treaties are a serious legal undertaking both in international and domestic law. Internationally, once in force, treaties are binding on the parties and become part of international law. Domestically, treaties to which the United States is a party are equivalent in status to Federal legislation, forming part of what the Constitution calls ``the supreme Law of the Land.''
However, the word treaty does not have the same meaning in the United States and in international law. Under international law, a ``treaty'' is any legally binding agreement between nations. In the United States, the word treaty is reserved for an agreement that is made ``by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate'' (Article II, Section 2, Clause 2 of the Constitution). International agreements not submitted to the Senate are known as ``executive agreements'' in the United States, but they are considered treaties and therefore binding under international law.
For various reasons, Presidents have increasingly concluded executive agreements. Many agreements are previously authorized or specifically approved by legislation, and such ``congressional-executive'' or statutory agreements have been treated almost interchangeably with treaties in several important court cases. Others, often referred to as ``sole executive agreements,'' are made pursuant to inherent powers claimed by the President under Article II of the Constitution.
Neither the Senate nor the Congress as a whole is involved in concluding sole executive agreements, and their status in domestic law is not fully resolved.
There is much more at that government link. If you have any questions or comments I suggest contacting your politician.
The US is as much to blame as others for not abiding by a “rules based international order”.
The United States is not a member of the International Criminal Court (ICC). The Act authorizes the president of the United States to use “all means necessary and appropriate to bring about the release of any U.S. or allied personnel being detained or imprisoned by, on behalf of, or at the request of the International Criminal Court”. This authorization led to the act being colloquially nicknamed “The Hague Invasion Act”, as the act allows the president to order U.S. military action, such as an invasion of the Netherlands, where The Hague is located, to protect American officials and military personnel from prosecution or rescue them from custody.
The ancient law of the high seas, still applies against pirates and terrorists (a sub-classification of piracy).
The UN is responsible for much of the border invaders. They use nonprofits and other subsidiaries to do the dirty work and fund them with our money. The UN also creates havoc on a world wide basis especially in Africa. Remember the Davos types don't want any African nation to escape poverty.They will do whatever necessary to make sure they stay in chaos.
Meanwhile NATO is busy starting WWIII.
When Trump returns he will get rid of both of them and start one good institution for the world. He will invite only those with values similar to those of the US in the 50's.
Trumps presidency is not just for us but for the entire world.
There’s no international law YET. Soon, though, sadly.