About time someone
got around to challenging
Cali’s setting precidence
and influencing EPA’s
setting of emission
standards.
Just because Cali has
millions of cars on the
road, doesn’t necessarily
create an emergency on
Wyoming’s part.
I hope the SC see’s fit
to decide in favor. Our
nutso gov here in NM
wants to be mini me
to Cali.
Climate hysteria is out of control.
Any idea which the other 11 states are?
I even went to the link and read the article and could not find the information aside from Alabama which is leading this.
I’m surprised not one congressman or senator has demanded a project plan for mitigating the effects of CO2 on a global scale. They do realize that this cannot be localized. Also, after 40 years there still isn’t a plan?
I’ll gladly support action to mitigate “climate change” if:
1. There is a plan in place for schedule.
2. There is a plan in place for cost.
3. There is a plan in place for scope.
4. There is a plan in place for risk.
5. There is a plan in place for resources required.
Also, I want to see a plan for mitigation of risk. How would we know if whoever is executing this plan doesn’t coverup if risks become issues. For example, in the process of cooling the planet, the result is out of variance, resulting in a massive freeze. (aka: Snowpiercer Syndrome)
However, if “they” want to do something now, I would say start with pollution, preferably water as it is our most relied upon resource to keep every living organism alive.
Anything other than this is just a load of crap. If confronted by a lib over this, just call them a moron and be on your way.
About damned time.