I’m surprised not one congressman or senator has demanded a project plan for mitigating the effects of CO2 on a global scale. They do realize that this cannot be localized. Also, after 40 years there still isn’t a plan?
I’ll gladly support action to mitigate “climate change” if:
1. There is a plan in place for schedule.
2. There is a plan in place for cost.
3. There is a plan in place for scope.
4. There is a plan in place for risk.
5. There is a plan in place for resources required.
Also, I want to see a plan for mitigation of risk. How would we know if whoever is executing this plan doesn’t coverup if risks become issues. For example, in the process of cooling the planet, the result is out of variance, resulting in a massive freeze. (aka: Snowpiercer Syndrome)
However, if “they” want to do something now, I would say start with pollution, preferably water as it is our most relied upon resource to keep every living organism alive.
Anything other than this is just a load of crap. If confronted by a lib over this, just call them a moron and be on your way.
Not Me!
Perhaps you forget that it is our government that will be coming up with those plans and paying for those plans.
Our government always underestimates the cost of everything by at least half.
Our government always over promises and over pays.
The EPA needs to be eliminated. It always exceeds its legislated authority and it is a constitutional violation from the start.