Posted on 05/20/2024 1:32:41 PM PDT by C19fan
A Frontier Airlines passenger forced an entire flight to deboard after she refused to comply with exit row instructions.
Video of the incident posted to social media shows the unidentified woman visibly angry with airline employees as fellow passengers pleaded with her to get off the plane.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
Then you didn’t realize the post you responded to was attempting to assert the idea that skin pigment has a mind of its own.
You falsely attributed a base motive to me. That is slander. Or libel. In any case, it is defamation.
My purpose is to warn you to watch your tongue.
I suggest that you should also open your eyes.
And the word you’re looking for is “sowing”, not “sewing”.
I guess not.
My post 3 was simply posted to the first post on the thread, as is normal for FR posting.
It is read in major professional airlines to all who are seated on exit door rows. The words are in the Federal code.
You never sat on an exit row. Pro passengers (business people) select the seating routinely, and incidentally often one has a pilot seated there dead heading to the destination or beyond.
“It is read in major professional airlines to all who are seated on exit door rows. The words are in the Federal code.”
What is it? What words? What point are you trying to make?
“You never sat on an exit row”
Several times.
Look it up. Satisfy your lack of knowledge.
“Look it up. Satisfy your lack of knowledge.”
My knowledge on the issue is solid. What is lacking is what is your point or are you just trolling?
“Yes, they are. However Frontier Airlines is subject to FAA rules on Exit Row passengers. They must agree to assist other passengers and the attendants in an emergency requiring egress through the emergency door on the row(s) where they are seated.”
The reason you won’t cite the regulations is that you know you are wrong.
(b) No certificate holder may seat a person in a seat affected by this section if the certificate holder determines that it is likely that the person would be unable to perform one or more of the applicable functions listed in paragraph (d) of this section because—
(1) The person lacks sufficient mobility, strength, or dexterity in both arms and hands, and both legs:
(i) To reach upward, sideways, and downward to the location of emergency exit and exit-slide operating mechanisms;
(ii) To grasp and push, pull, turn, or otherwise manipulate those mechanisms;
(iii) To push, shove, pull, or otherwise open emergency exits;
(iv) To lift out, hold, deposit on nearby seats, or maneuver over the seatbacks to the next row objects the size and weight of over-wing window exit doors;
(v) To remove obstructions similar in size and weight to over-wing exit doors;
(vi) To reach the emergency exit expeditiously;
(vii) To maintain balance while removing obstructions;
(viii) To exit expeditiously;
(ix) To stabilize an escape slide after deployment; or
(x) To assist others in getting off an escape slide;
Airlines are required to develop their own policies implementing these regulations. Flying regularly on Southwest, the standard instruction is always to "assist others", without specifying the exact nature of that assistance.
“(b) No certificate holder may seat a person in a seat affected by this section if the certificate holder determines that it is likely that the person would be unable to perform one or more of the applicable functions listed in paragraph (d) of this section because—
(1) The person lacks sufficient mobility, strength, or dexterity in both arms and hands, and both legs:”
NOTHING ABOUT THE PASSENGER MAKING AN AGREEMENT TO HELP OTHERS.
You are really sneaky!
“(b) No certificate holder may seat a person in a seat affected by this section if the certificate holder determines that it is likely that the person would be unable to perform one or more of the applicable functions listed in paragraph (d) of this section because—
Nothing about agreeing to help passengers.
-—————Section d——————
(d) Each certificate holder shall include on passenger information cards, presented in the language in which briefings and oral commands are given by the crew, at each exit seat affected by this section, information that, in the event of an emergency in which a crewmember is not available to assist, a passenger occupying an exit seat may use if called upon to perform the following functions:
(1) Locate the emergency exit;
(2) Recognize the emergency exit opening mechanism;
(3) Comprehend the instructions for operating the emergency exit;
(4) Operate the emergency exit;
(5) Assess whether opening the emergency exit will increase the hazards to which passengers may be exposed;
(6) Follow oral directions and hand signals given by a crewmember;
(7) Stow or secure the emergency exit door so that it will not impede use of the exit;
(8) Assess the condition of an escape slide, activate the slide, and stabilize the slide after deployment to assist others in getting off the slide;
(9) Pass expeditiously through the emergency exit; and
(10) Assess, select, and follow a safe path away from the emergency exit.
Why wouldn’t section (x) be relevant?
All I know is that I just sat down in a seat on the overwing exit of a Southwest 373, and the stew asked everyone to confirm that they were willing and able to assist in the event 9f an evacuation.
Not trying to pick a fight, just seems that the (x) section would cover the “assist” demand, since the overwing briefing never actually specifies what part of the evacuation would involve the “assist”.
What am I missing?
“Why wouldn’t section (x) be relevant?”
The red states the certificate holder determines. Nothing about the passenger agreeing to comply.
The functions required are in Section D. (x) is not in section D.
(x) is in the section headed by “(1) The person lacks sufficient mobility, strength, or dexterity in both arms and hands, and both legs:”. Only refers to capability, not consent.
-—————The reg ——————
b) No certificate holder may seat a person in a seat affected by this section if the certificate holder determines that it is likely that the person would be unable to perform one or more of the applicable functions listed in paragraph (d) of this section because—
(1) The person lacks sufficient mobility, strength, or dexterity in both arms and hands, and both legs:
.....
(ix) To stabilize an escape slide after deployment; or
(x) To assist others in getting off an escape slide;
Thanks. I can see where you’re coming from.
“Thanks”
Thank you!
I say you’re afraid to openly state what you meant in post # 6.
Does my open observation of that fact cause you butthurt?
It's true. I think you know it's true, but you're afraid to admit it because somebody might call you ugly names. Grow a pair ...
Blacks commit more crimes. I’ve been saying this for years, because it’s true. But it’s not because they’re black. It’s because as a population they’ve been mind-controlled to become criminals. This can be erased in a generation.
And your snide little comments are intended to cause racial division. You’ve also been mind-controlled.
What you need to be doing is try to help unite blacks and whites. The way to do that is point the finger at the leftist globalist cabal.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.