Right there is a red herring. You avoided answering my actual question about the government requiring electromagnetic radiation weather modification to be reported, by bringing up the subject of whether radar is ionizing radiation.
RED HERRING. You STILL failed to address the evidence I brought up.
I never said this was not about physics. But this particular piece of evidence is not from physics; it is from the US government, which is supposed to know what kinds of weather modification there are.
You keep saying that radar is not ionizing, but you haven’t addressed the link I brought up where physicists were discussing that and it actually ends up being a question of voltage. Nor have you addressed my questions about whether radar whose electromagnetic waves are TIME REVERSED still fits your 55-year-old, way-behind-the-Soviets basic physics definition. The world of science has grown a lot since 55 years ago, ya know.
“You keep saying that radar is not ionizing, “
Yep. And you defend AJ who says it is. First sentence in OP.
“but you haven’t addressed the link I brought up where physicists were discussing that and it actually ends up being a question of voltage.”
I don’t do Easter egg hunts.