It’s DNA not RNA. I see no reason that they would need to use substances developed for RNA when doing DNA gene therapy which has been around a lot longer and has nothing to do with the immune system or vaccination.
You sound a little nuts.
The article as posted didn’t mention whether it was RNA or DNA. I would imagine they would still use the lipid nanoparticle carrier for both since that was used to assist the RNA/DNA getting past the cell wall and into the ribosomes for RNA or into the nucleus if they used DNA.
Toxicological profile of lipid-based nanostructures: are they considered as completely safe nanocarriers?
” Due to unique physicochemical properties, they are able to cross many barriers, which is not possible for traditional drugs. Nevertheless, exposure to NPs and their following interactions with organelles and macromolecules can result in negative effects on cells, especially, they can induce cytotoxicity, epigenicity, genotoxicity, and cell death.”
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32053030/
He is nuts and a raving antisemite.
Probably just a chaos troll.