Fake News Until Proven Real ...
... or Real News Until Proven Fake?
https://badlands.substack.com/p/fake-news-until-proven-real
Prof. Stefan Homburg Explains With Surgical Precision: There WAS NO Pandemic! (Germany)
8 minutes
https://twitter.com/wideawake_media/status/1788492700586500173?
massive illegal immigration into the UK has not resulted in any significant GDP gain, but has greatly contributed to a housing shortage
https://justthenews.com/world/mass-migration-not-delivering-economic-benefits-study-finds
excerpt from the badlands piece bitt linked up thread:
*************
Recently, I heard a couple of Badlanders argue about how one should process information that is reported to us from the media. One essentially said that everything should be assumed to be a lie until proven true, and the other said everything should be received from a place of neutrality, and then one should determine whether it is true or a lie. Neither said that everything reported by the media should be assumed true until proven untrue.
In this argument, I would have to side with the former: it is healthier to assume everything the media reports is a lie or manipulation of the truth until proven true.
The media has proven to us they are untrustworthy, and their purpose is to deceive us.