Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: wita
That would in my opinion involve being there, knowing what was in the hearts of those making statements you were not in a position to understand.

Well; if the playing field is level, you were not there either, so how can you state that I am in no position to understand?

154 posted on 05/13/2024 5:23:01 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies ]


To: Elsie

Well; if the playing field is level, you were not there either, so how can you state that I am in no position to understand?

Clearly if all the quotes in your #152 were true, would you have been likely to have understood? They were true in the time period in which they were said. They are true today, but they are not at the heart of how the Church is bringing the Gospel to the world.

You appear to be attempting to understand yesteryear with the eyes of 2024. So again I would suggest you are looking at the Journal of Discourses when your focus should be on the Book of Mormon. One comes from the mouth of a loving and merciful God, the other is the words of men even if true, it would be second hand.

You might be tempted to apply the second hand business to the Book of Mormon, but the book states otherwise.


155 posted on 05/14/2024 3:40:30 AM PDT by wita (Under oath since 1966 in defense of Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson