Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Disqualified! NEXT!
1 posted on 04/27/2024 3:07:08 PM PDT by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Libloather

Case dismissed, ole Jack has no standing as he is just a private citizen and not legally appointed.


2 posted on 04/27/2024 3:11:26 PM PDT by rigelkentaurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

Many pundits raised the question. Why didn’t Trump’s lawyers?


3 posted on 04/27/2024 3:11:53 PM PDT by monkeyshine (live and let live is dead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

Provides an easy way out without taking on an issue that the SC would like not to have to address.


7 posted on 04/27/2024 3:19:43 PM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather
Sauer replied that Trump's attorneys had not raised that concern "directly

And why not?

9 posted on 04/27/2024 3:29:49 PM PDT by Fido969 (Ia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

Sometimes I wonder whose side his attorneys are on.


13 posted on 04/27/2024 3:42:10 PM PDT by Flaming Conservative ((Pray without ceasing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

Sounds like Trump’s attorneys either weren’t thinking or they’re in on it.


17 posted on 04/27/2024 4:01:19 PM PDT by jacknhoo (Luke 12:51; Think ye, that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, no; but separation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

Will the Supremes put a hold on this until the Florida court decides if Jack can attack?


18 posted on 04/27/2024 4:02:09 PM PDT by Greenidgypsy (I loathe the MSM.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

Yeah, that’s going just about as far as Obama’s fake pdf birth certificate


21 posted on 04/27/2024 4:42:17 PM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

Let’s see where this goes. Was the plan to bring it up later?


22 posted on 04/27/2024 4:58:15 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2024/jan/12/legal-scholars-say-special-counsel-jack-smith-wasn/


25 posted on 04/27/2024 5:27:43 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

Not only should they disqualify him, they should roll up the elimination of the Fiction they created called Qualified Immunity into the decision so Trump can JAIL AND SUE HIM and everyone involved.


31 posted on 04/27/2024 6:56:25 PM PDT by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

You can count on Thomas going after the fa t that Jackoff Smith has no lawful authority to indict Trump.

I listened to the oral arguments. The issues are not complex.


35 posted on 04/27/2024 9:26:33 PM PDT by WASCWatch ( WASC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

Wouldn’t that be a huge ruling? Imagine if the USSC simply ruled that Smith was not properly appointed and that all lawsuits brought by him in Federal Courts are hereby dismissed!


36 posted on 04/28/2024 1:25:36 AM PDT by Enterprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson