Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

‘Unprecedented defiance’: Jack Smith urges Mar-a-Lago judge not to make government cave to Trump’s discovery demands, ‘corrects’ defense theories one by one
Law & Crime ^ | 4/22/24 | Colin Kalmbacher

Posted on 04/24/2024 2:43:11 AM PDT by Libloather

Special counsel Jack Smith on Monday implored the judge in charge of former President Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago documents case not to force the government into complying with defense discovery motions.

In January, attorneys for the 45th president accused Smith and his office of myriad discovery violations in a rambling defense filing that also asserted that the genesis of the federal Florida case could be traced to “politically motivated operatives” within President Joe Biden’s administration who launched a “crusade” against their client to hamstring his chances in the 2024 presidential election.

In the government’s response in opposition, Smith aims to methodically pick apart each theory floated by the defense — while trying to convince U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon that the alleged discovery violations are not only misplaced but irrelevant to the case.

“The defendants have received substantial, timely, and thorough discovery in this case,” the government’s response begins. “By early September 2023, the Government had provided the defendants with over 1.28 million pages of unclassified discovery and all of the CCTV footage obtained in the investigation; since then, the Government has supplemented its production as necessary. This production not only complies with the Government’s constitutional and rule-based discovery obligations; it goes far beyond.”

Trump, for his part, claims the prosecution has been withholding “exculpatory evidence in the hands of the senior officials” at multiple federal agencies including the FBI, the Department of Justice, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the Department of Energy, the National Security Agency, and the Department of State.

In their motion to compel discovery, the defense accused those unnamed officials of being engaged in a “lawless mission” to gin up charges against Trump over the retention of the documents in question — with a particular amount of disdain leveled at the intelligence community’s...

(Excerpt) Read more at lawandcrime.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Conspiracy; History; Local News
KEYWORDS: 202309; defense; discovery; exculpatoryevidence; jacksmith; judge; maralago; smith; trump; trumppersecution
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
Could be old news.
1 posted on 04/24/2024 2:43:11 AM PDT by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Libloather

“By early September 2023, the Government had provided the defendants with over 1.28 million pages of unclassified discovery...”

Those millions of pages should be sufficient for the judge to throw the case out of court on the grounds of extreme legal mischief and Smith should be charged accordingly. Those millions of pages are a giant smokescreen to hide the fact that the government has no case at all.

It just means Smith has no bottom line. If he had, he would lead with it in all ferocity.


2 posted on 04/24/2024 2:50:24 AM PDT by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: odawg
"By early September 2023, the Government had provided the defendants with over 1.28 million pages of unclassified discovery..."

Was that 1.28 million pages of filtered unclassified discovery?
3 posted on 04/24/2024 3:07:04 AM PDT by clearcarbon (Fraudulent elections have consequences.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

“rambling defense.”

Uh-huh.


4 posted on 04/24/2024 3:28:14 AM PDT by sauropod (Ne supra crepidam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: clearcarbon

Who can fire federal judges?


5 posted on 04/24/2024 3:29:31 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (If it's Boeing, I ain't going!c)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

A million pages of docs are not useful if they are not pertinent or are filled with black lines of redactions.


6 posted on 04/24/2024 3:31:10 AM PDT by lurk (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz

Congress through impeachment and conviction [requires 2/3 vote in the senate]. Appointments are for life.


7 posted on 04/24/2024 3:39:30 AM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: lurk

The latest unredacted releases gave the whole game away.


8 posted on 04/24/2024 3:40:28 AM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: lurk; Libloather
"Over one million pages..."

9 posted on 04/24/2024 3:41:38 AM PDT by outofsalt (If history teaches us anything, it's that history rarely teaches anything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: clearcarbon

“Was that 1.28 million pages of filtered unclassified discovery?”

Filtered and Redacted out the Wahzoo. That’s why all the recent wrangling about redactions to be removed. Judge Cannon fnally ordered them to file some docs in unredacted form and they proved Trump’s case regarding DOJ and WH influence and manipulation of the investigation.
Add to that the malodorous manner in which Smith secured his (fake) appointment, and this case should have been sent packing months ago, with prejudice.


10 posted on 04/24/2024 3:46:32 AM PDT by PubliusMM (RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion. The Dhimmicraps are ALL Traitors. All of them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

So Law & Crime is a biased liberal site


11 posted on 04/24/2024 4:08:01 AM PDT by maddog55 (The only thing systemic in America is the left's hatred of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz
Who can fire federal judges?

Voters who don't vote for the clymers who put them in office in the first place. A concept the clowns in the GOPe either don't understand or know all too well which is why they consistently work overtime to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.

12 posted on 04/24/2024 4:36:16 AM PDT by Dahoser (I finally figured out what to call him: Fakephonyfraudident Biden.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Dahoser

Trump: show me the evidence.

Prosecutor to his minions: how many phone books were seized. Count the pages.

Prosecutor to judge: I have provided many pages.

1.200.000 pages is tactic to bury defense in garbage. Typical strategy when you have nothing.


13 posted on 04/24/2024 4:45:57 AM PDT by Mouton (A 150MT hit will not solve our problems now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: odawg

“You stole something.”

“I did not.”

“Yes you did.”

“What?”

“Something important.”

“What is it?”

“It’s so important I can’t show you.”

“Riiiiigghtt.”

Smith has nothing or he would have showed it.

EC


14 posted on 04/24/2024 4:48:55 AM PDT by Ex-Con777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Trump has a right to discovery.


15 posted on 04/24/2024 4:56:41 AM PDT by tennmountainman ( (“Less propaganda would be appreciated.” JimRob 12-2-2023 DITTO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

I doubt anyone here believes the FJB cartel and the Just-Us dept are going to hand over millions of unredacted pages. They will slow-walk, delay, file bogus motions, etc until it becomes apparent that the documents must be turned over. Before that happens there will be a giant fire in the warehouse that holds all the originals.

Oh dear, how did that happen ... ??


16 posted on 04/24/2024 4:59:38 AM PDT by ByteMercenary (Cho Bi Dung and KamalHo are not my leaders.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather; All
“Put simply, the Government here confronted an extraordinary situation: a former President engaging in calculated and persistent obstruction of the collection of Presidential records, which, as a matter of law, belong to the United States for the benefit of history and posterity, and, as a matter of fact, here included a trove of highly classified documents containing some of the nation’s most sensitive information,” the filing reads. “The law required that those documents be collected. And the record establishes that the relevant government officials performed their tasks with professionalism and patience in the face of unprecedented defiance.”

Presidential records for Barack Obama are governed by the Presidential Records Act (PRA). Obama Presidential records became subject to Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests on January 20, 2022. ie 5 years after Obama left office per Presidential Records Act.

Press Statement on Public Release of NARA Records Concerning the 15 Boxes Received from Mar-a-Lago in January 2022
Monday, October 3, 2022

Washington, DC

Today, the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) is releasing documents processed in response to numerous Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests for NARA records related to the 15 boxes that we received in January 2022 from former President Trump’s Mar-a-Lago, Florida estate.

https://www.archives.gov/press/press-releases/2023/nr-23-003

What happens to the five year rule boys with Trump’s records?

17 posted on 04/24/2024 5:04:14 AM PDT by Lockbox (politicians, they all seemed like game show hosts to me.... Sting…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

It’s a criminal conspiracy, Jack.


18 posted on 04/24/2024 5:14:25 AM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

yikes...does that article have a heavy lefty bent ?


19 posted on 04/24/2024 5:21:13 AM PDT by stylin19a ( Why do "overlook" and "oversee" mean opposite things?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lurk

They are useful to support the story that we gave so much at the office.


20 posted on 04/24/2024 5:21:52 AM PDT by Judge Bean
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson