According to HI statute, the HDOH MUST give a certified letter of verification to a qualified requestor, verifying any requested information that is contained on a valid HI BC.
Why do YOU think they gave 3 non-certified letters in response to 3 separate qualified requestors - including one that they knew would be submitted in a court of law?
Why would they do that, other than the only legal reason to do it? Three times is very deliberate, this isn’t a “mistake”. Why do YOU say they did it?
Hello butter I didn’t know you were back at FreeRepublic. How have you been?
The three letters of verification are certainly legal (butter has a hyper-technical opinion about why they are invalid) and are legal proof that Obama was born in Hawaii. Two of the verifications were sent to secretaries of state in Arizona (Bennett) and Kansas (Kobach). The last one was submitted to the federal district court in Mississippi.
You can view that last one by scrolling to the end of this document.
https://www.scribd.com/document/96289285/Mississippi-Democratic-Party-Motion-v-Taitz