[hanamizu]

It was an open appeal to racial solidarity.

---

Yes it was, but it is important to remember that L.A.P.D was pretty well known to be less than on the up and up when it came to things like planting evidence. A few years after the O.J. trial L.A. had to pay millions to criminals the L.A.P.D had faked evidence to gain convictions.

Was it unreasonable to doubt Fuhrman’s finding of the gloves? Maybe not so much. Not saying O.J. was innocent but the case was pretty much circumstantial.

[Lonesome in Massachussets]

Circumstantial evidence is often more reliable than eyewitnesses. O.J. was guilty beyond peradventure of doubt.

[Jaded]

Then there was the evidence Furhman carried around in his car for days. One would think that in a celebrity case in the 90’s, LAPD would have taken more care in evidence collecting.