Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: discostu

The country went through all the trouble of making a foundational document that said all men are created equal, and then said “except in some states, where you can be property”.

*************************************

Just yesterday I was telling my daughter about this - that many of the states wanted to get rid of slavery from the very beginning. But then the southern states wouldn’t have joined the nation. So they made compromises.

I know a lawyer that was involved in a huge corporate lawsuit. When he got home after the months-long meetings in D.C. and a solution had been worked out he said “Oh, it was okay I guess. We both agreed on the compromise that was arrived at. But, I don’t know, it seems like such a ....

compromise.”


122 posted on 04/05/2024 1:48:58 PM PDT by 21twelve (Ever Vigilant. Never Fearful.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]


To: 21twelve

Some compromises are necessary, certainly in corporate law. Whether or not people can be property... that’s not really a good thing to compromise on. Because really that wasn’t a compromise. That was just flat out discarding an ideal. I don’t really expect corporations to have ideals. People, societies, countries, those are different. And our founders stated one, then chickened out.


123 posted on 04/05/2024 1:59:52 PM PDT by discostu (like a dog being shown a card trick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson