:: Trusting what they say or understanding what they do requires bending ones own head around to a non-regular place. ::
This is the same reasoning I have for discounting my dark-horse candidate of Adm Michael Rogers.
He checks off some good boxes (especially the “military loyalty” ones) but, you can never be quite sure with a spook.
I do think that a military man is in the mix, tho.
“Military is the only way.”
We do owe Adm Rogers one. By all accounts he’s the one who clued Trump in to Trump Tower being bugged. In his case I’ll trust Trump if he uses him in some way. But, as noted with Flynn, it might be best to let him work on the Q-T?
:: Trusting what they say or understanding what they do requires bending ones own head around to a non-regular place. ::
This is the same reasoning I have for discounting my dark-horse candidate of Adm Michael Rogers.
He checks off some good boxes (especially the “military loyalty” ones) but, you can never be quite sure with a spook.
I do think that a military man is in the mix, tho.
“Military is the only way.”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I agree Adm Rogers gets some credit for cluing Trump in, and I think he may also be who talked him into this “life” he’s in now. I found out he is teaching at Northwestern, this made me question whose side he’s on. That is a very liberal school and I doubt he’ll change that aspect of the journalism school.
https://www.kellogg.northwestern.edu/faculty/directory/rogers_michael.aspx