I have to disagree with you on this, but to a specific point. I would say: It's more sensible, in today's world, to believe that the cause of a given catastrophic accident may have multiple possible causes, NONE of which should be automatically ruled out or blindly accepted until more real information is known."
Accepting an airline disaster as an accident right off the bat is as foolish as accepting that same airline disaster as a terrorist event right off the bat.
I understand. But some posters here seem to make a full-time job out of reading conspiracy and malice into everything that happens. They seem to specialize in frightening people, and it’s hard to avoid wondering who is paying them to demoralize everyone.