Posted on 03/25/2024 6:06:04 AM PDT by airdalecheif
California Democrats are proposing new gun legislation that would replace the current one-time registration system with an annual registration requirement coupled with a fee paid to the state.
(Excerpt) Read more at msn.com ...
Thou shalt not infringe.
Restrictions mean nothing as we all know. It is just another form of virtue signaling.
Just another un-followed and likely un-enforced law.
Even if cops come to your door, without the time and cost to obtain a warrant, they may not enter nor search.
Record every interaction
It's OK, California is no longer a part of the US. So, whatever.
The constitution is merely a suggestion in today’s America.
Shall not be infringed.
The right should start suing for poor people to be given guns. Under the same welfare arguments...if you can’t afford one you can’t exercise your rights to have one.
How does this substantially differ from a poll tax?
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
We always talk about the first sentence, but look at the last. A warrant may not just be to search, but must be to search for a specific item, in a specific location, with probable cause under oath.
That means, to search for your Glock 17, in the basement work room. No other item and no other location.
Californians should also expect an annually renewal and fee for their 1st Amendment rights, and similarly for their 3rd Amendment right (so they don’t have to house illegal aliens), their 4th Amendment rights to avoid warrantless searches day or night, and their 5th, 6th, 7th and 8th Amendment rights. Californians, and other Americans, have already lost their 9th and 10th Amendment tights.
“Shall not be infringed”
One of the happiest days in my life was when I saw California in my rear view mirror. Maybe THE happiest...
They have Idiots that just sit around to think up ways to SCREW THE CITIZENS
But you are wrong. To a leftist, more shootings mean they need more gun laws because they haven’t gone far enough.
Just another example of the innate racism in the Demo party. When asked if ID is needed to vote they automatically say no ‘cause that would adversely impact black (poor) voters since they cannot afford the fee to get a free gov’mt ID card.
So, assessing a fee on gun ownership would not only be asset seizure but adversely impact black citizens.
Anyone who is a legal gun owner and remains a resident of California doesn’t have the common sense to be a legal gun owner.
“It is just another form of virtue signaling.”
It’s a way to arrest or fine you. It’s a way to take away your rights entirely. It’s a way to make you spend all of your wealth in the legal system defending yourself.
The anti-gun crown are the twenty-first century terminators. They will not stop until you are dead.
How about we register politicians and political appointees at all levels of government, annually, with a fee?
And create a central database of them all, with their names and addresses.
They need drug testing, and also financial scrutiny
"California Dems Push Bill Requiring Guns to Be Registered Annually, with a Fee"
FR: Never Accept the Premise of Your Opponent’s Argument
Regarding California elite Democrats pushing to grab your guns, ALL Democratic and Republican Trump-supporting patriots in the nation need to come to the rescue of Californians being oppressed under the boots of their renegade state government, likewise for citizens of other activist states, by doing the following.
More specifically, patriots need to support hopeful Trump 47 with a new patriot Congress in November that will actually do its constitutional duty to make 14th Amendment-based penal laws that discourage state actors from abridging constitutionally enumerated protections, 2nd Amendment (2A) in this example.
Excerpted from 14A:
"Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States [emphasis added]; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."
"Section 5: The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article."
Regarding Section 1 above, note that the congressional record shows that Rep. John Bingham, the main author of that section, had included 2A when he read the Bill of Rights as main examples of privileges and immunities that 14A applies to the states.
“See 2nd Amendment (Article II) about middle of 2nd column.” — John Bingham, Appendix to the Congressional Globe
Patriots, the post-17th Amendment ratification Congress is not your friend.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.