Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis Stands With Floridian Property Owners Over Squatters
Legal Insurrection ^ | 21 Mar, 2024 | Fuzzy Slippers

Posted on 03/22/2024 8:55:51 AM PDT by MtnClimber

“The Florida Legislature unanimously passed a bill that would allow police to immediately remove squatters — a departure from the lengthy court cases required in most states.”

For some inexplicable reason, squatters’ rights laws are commonplace throughout these United States. In many states, a person or persons can enter and inhabit another person’s vacant property, set up house, and after—in most cases—a mere 30 days claim some form of bizarre “right” to inhabit the home in which they did not pay a day’s rent nor a single mortgage payment: a home they do not own, did not buy, and have no right to occupy.

But states, including red states, have an array of “squatters’ rights” rules and laws that will offend—nay, even assault—the senses of all normal, law-abiding Americans.

The New York Post reports:

A former live-in Queens handyman has refused to leave the $2 million home where he once worked for several years, leaving the rightful property owners out in the cold — and it’s totally legal.

In Georgia, a property owner who left to care for his sick wife returned to learn that interlopers had moved in and changed the locks on his home, and he’s not allowed to kick them out.

The reason is a curious legal loophole that gives would-be trespassers the right to stay put if they only stay in a property long enough to claim legal residency — otherwise known as “squatter’s rights.”

Squatter’s rights, also known as “adverse possession” under the law, allow an individual to occupy a property and remain there without the owner’s permission.

Recently, there was great outrage when the public learned that a home owner was prevented from turning off utilities to his own squatter-occupied home. This makes NO sense. Who votes for this? Oh, right anyone who votes for Democrats.

But I digress.

In Georgia, a man was unable to claim his own home because squatters slunk in while he was away caring for is ailing wife.

A Georgia man claims he returned home from caring for his sick wife to find that squatters had changed the locks on his home and moved in — and now local laws are blocking him from evicting the alleged freeloaders.

“Basically, these people came in Friday, broke into my house and had a U-Haul move all their stuff in. It’s frustrating. It’s very frustrating. I can’t even sleep,” DeKalb man Paul Callins told WSB-TV.

Callins had sunk thousands of dollars into the home and renovated it with his own hands after he inherited it from his late father, but since squatters moved in, he’s found himself facing nothing but obstacles to evicting the alleged intruders.

. . . . Rather than forcibly evicting the squatters, Georgia law requires homeowners file an “Affidavit of Intruder,” which then needs to work its way through the court system before police can act, Callins explained.

Situations like Callins’ have become all too common in Georgia.

About 1,200 homes across DeKalb County are occupied by squatters, according to the National Rental Home Council trade group.

In New York, a homeowner was ordered to continue paying all utilities for the criminals who occupied her home.

New York homeowner is in a complicated battle with squatters who have taken over her property. She was arrested for trying to get them out.

Adele Andaloro, who put her $1.2 million Flushing, Queens, residence that she inherited from her family for sale, realized that someone randomly changed the locks, WABC reported. It was squatters that had been occupying the home where she grew up since February. In the city, squatters are considered tenants after living there for 30 days.

. . . . Police warned Andaloro that changing the locks could result in her arrest, but she called the locksmith anyway and said she wasn’t leaving her home.

. . . . Andaloro was arrested for unlawful eviction. In addition to changing locks on tenants, it’s also against the law for a homeowner to remove tenant possessions or shut off the utilities, per the New York Post.

That’s just the tip of the squatter property takeover movement, though. Illegal aliens are being taught how to take over American citizens’s homes via squatting, including learning how to turn their squatting ‘clam’ into “legal” theft of the rightful owner’s home.

Fox News reports:

A Venezuelan migrant has gone viral after he posted a video to social media that explained how illegal immigrants can take advantage of squatting laws and stay in American homes.

“I have thought about invading a house in the United States,” a man identified as Leonal Moreno said in the TikTok video. “I found out that there is a law that says that if a house is not inhabited, we can seize it.”

The man told his followers in Spanish that he anticipated his next business would be “invading” abandoned houses. He claimed that some of his African friends have told him they have already taken seven homes in the U.S.

Moreno also said that for migrants to avoid living on the street and not be a “public burden,” the law says deteriorated homes can be acquired by others, repaired and lived in. The man also claimed the new inhabitants can then sell the house.

. . . . Squatters and tenants’ rights laws vary across the country, with some states providing protection for non-paying individuals, allowing them to occupy a property for extended periods. In areas where complex laws bar police from taking action, homeowners have few options to reclaim their property beyond pursuing a civil case, which can take months.

This is pretty much unimaginable to most of us, but you really (and I mean really) need to look at the laws in your state, no matter how “red” you think i is, with regard to squatters’ rights to your property.

Florida governor Ron DeSantis is making great strides in protecting Florida home owners from this clearly organized and criminal squatter nightmare.

Fox Business reports (archive link):

The Florida Legislature unanimously passed a bill that would allow police to immediately remove squatters — a departure from the lengthy court cases required in most states.

“It gives me a real feeling of positive hope that we still have the ability to discuss challenges in our society and work with our legislatures in a bipartisan way,” Patti Peeples, a Sunshine State property owner who was barred from her own home after squatters refused to leave, told News4Jax.

The legislation, which passed both chambers earlier this month, would allow police to remove squatters without a lease authorized by the property owner and adds criminal penalties.

And that, my friends, is how it’s done.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Society
KEYWORDS: adverseownership; adversepossession; squat; squatters; squatting
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

1 posted on 03/22/2024 8:55:51 AM PDT by MtnClimber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Amazing that this is the legal process. I just thought there must be an ammo shortage.


2 posted on 03/22/2024 8:56:07 AM PDT by MtnClimber (For photos of scenery and wildlife, click on my screen name for my FR home page. More photos added.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Our government hates us.


3 posted on 03/22/2024 9:01:53 AM PDT by Gary from Dayton (Army Vet 1986-1991)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Gary from Dayton

Our government hates us.


And they want us dead.


4 posted on 03/22/2024 9:03:25 AM PDT by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

This should be so easy—Squaters have no contract with the owner, they get removed for trespass, vandalism, burglery, jailed, deported, maybe shot. Renters have contract, they go through legal eviction if necessary. Two very different situations.


5 posted on 03/22/2024 9:04:14 AM PDT by Reno89519 (If Biden is mentally unfit to stand trial, he is mentally unfit to be president. He needs to resign.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: MtnClimber

https://andersonadvisors.com/squatters-rights/

History of Squatting

In the days of the Wild West, ranch owners could deal with errant squatters by riding out in a posse and chasing the squatters off their land. Obviously, a lot has changed since the days of stage coaches and gold rushes, because nearly every state has laws stating a landlord cannot use force or the threat of force to disburse squatters from their property. Instead, they must file the proper paperwork and work through legal channels.

The idea of squatting goes back to medieval England and its common law. The king’s courts would routinely rule in favor of individuals who occupied a property without permission, providing the owner did not take action against them within a certain statute of limitations.

Back in those days, squatter conflict routinely come into play when peasants seeking escape from the tax burden of their current location would move into the country and build a house on the land, acquiring the property by assumption (a common practice at the time).

Ancient Welsh folk tradition states that if a person can build a home on common land in one night, it would belong to them free and clear. This is known as a “the one-night house.” Other variants of the belief specify that a squatter would need to have a fire burning in the hearth by morning, whereupon they could extend the boundaries of their newly acquired property by throwing an axe as far as possible from all four corners of the home.

Thankfully in the United States, such practices are no longer applicable. State legislatures have created a more concrete set of rules regarding squatting.

However, if an individual unlawfully takes possession of a property and occupies it consistently for a certain period of time, they may actually establish a stronger claim to the property than the actual owner. Though it sounds bizarre, squatting is quite common, and a popular tool used by ill-intentioned individuals to take possession of abandoned properties.


7 posted on 03/22/2024 9:09:05 AM PDT by PeterPrinciple (Thinking Caps are no longer being issued but there must be a warehouse full of them somewhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Why Do Squatters Have Rights?
The main goal of squatters’ rights is to discourage the use of vigilante justice. If landowners were allowed to use violence or the threat of violence to evict a squatter, the situation could quickly escalate and become dangerous. Moreover, it would create a climate of vigilante justice that could spill into other areas of life, reducing the safety of society that people have generally come to expect from the places they live.

Squatters have rights so that, in the bigger picture, justice can be facilitated. It’s very similar to tenants’ rights that protect a renter from an unscrupulous landlord. The laws spell out the rights of each party involved to keep the real estate markets stable and negotiations (mostly) peaceful.


The main goal of squatters’ rights is to discourage the use of vigilante justice.


8 posted on 03/22/2024 9:10:24 AM PDT by PeterPrinciple (Thinking Caps are no longer being issued but there must be a warehouse full of them somewhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

People can say what they want about fox news but Lawrence Jones did a story a few months ago about squatters in Jacksonville Florida that really got the attention of Florida legislators... that got the ball rolling on this.

A great example of what a REPUBLICAN state Legislature is capable of accomplishing.


9 posted on 03/22/2024 9:11:48 AM PDT by V_TWIN (America...so great even the people that hate it refuse to leave!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeterPrinciple
The main goal of squatters’ rights is to discourage the use of vigilante justice.

When laws protect criminals it encourages vigilante justice.

10 posted on 03/22/2024 9:14:35 AM PDT by MtnClimber (For photos of scenery and wildlife, click on my screen name for my FR home page. More photos added.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

“Feb 2, 2022 · In Tennessee, a squatter must possess the property continuously for a period of 20 years before they can make an adverse possession claim (Tenn. Code. Ann. §§ 28-2-101, et seq).”


11 posted on 03/22/2024 9:15:18 AM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Vote for the Dems and see what you get; Mayhem.


12 posted on 03/22/2024 9:19:22 AM PDT by chopperk (s to )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber; Joe Brower; Travis McGee; NautiNurse; devane617

The only problem with the headline is that there is nothing in the article actually giving DeSantis’ stance on this new bill, just a sentence saying he is making great strides. I’m sure he will sign it, but I don’t like misleading headlines. Does anybody know if the Governor’s office submitted the bill to the legislature, for example?

Still good news overall. Squatters are scum.


13 posted on 03/22/2024 9:21:08 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (FBI out of Florida!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reno89519
The dodge that squatters often use is to phony up a lease and claim that they are there legally. Faced with contradictory stories, the cops tend to back down and call it a civil matter.
14 posted on 03/22/2024 9:26:59 AM PDT by Rockingham (`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber
In AL, full legal adverse possession requires 20 years residence, with 10 years of paying the property taxes.

"If the squatters pose a threat or engage in illegal activity, you can contact the police to have them immediately removed. But filing an eviction lawsuit is still required to keep them off the property. The full eviction process can take 2-6 weeks. It's important to follow all procedures properly."

15 posted on 03/22/2024 9:54:03 AM PDT by citizen (Put all LBQTwhatever programming on a new subscription service: PERV-TThose look good)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Floridas castle doctrine would have been sufficient enough for me.


16 posted on 03/22/2024 9:59:43 AM PDT by diverteach (Pureblood proud and unashamed !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

“The main goal of squatters’ rights is to discourage the use of vigilante justice.

When laws protect criminals it encourages vigilante justice.”

Exactly this. That’s exactly what it does.


17 posted on 03/22/2024 10:05:14 AM PDT by GrumpyOldGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber
In many cases, the police are a greater danger to We the People than are common criminals.

Why?

Because the police (and their masters) PROTECT THE CRIMINALS.

18 posted on 03/22/2024 10:08:00 AM PDT by NorthMountain (... the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Reno89519

It should be legal to shoot them.


19 posted on 03/22/2024 10:17:45 AM PDT by Senormechanico
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

I guess trespassing is an extinct crime. :(


20 posted on 03/22/2024 10:21:16 AM PDT by Buttons12 ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson