Repeating from my original post:
On 27 June 2017, Maersk IT systems were the victim of a malware attack utilizing NotPetya, which was designed to appear to be a ransomware attack.[135] The cyberattack was perpetrated by the Russian military cyberorganization, the GRU, and designed to attack Ukraine, but in fact almost destroyed Maersk Shipping. Wired magazine described the malware attack as the ‘Most Devastating Cyberattack in History.’[136] In March 2020 Maersk revealed they would be terminating the employment and outsourcing the work of the UK based IT team that helped them successfully fend off and recover from the ransomware attack that shut down operations,[137] as Maersk was forced to rebuild its IT infrastructure in 10 days and sustained losses of more than US$300 million to put on its tax relief as expenses.[68]
Cyber attack vulnerability demonstrated in 2017.
Between Maersk and Evergiven the Pedos are having a heckuva time getting those kiddie containers all the way to Epstein Island. Sounds like they’re trying to hire Prince Harry and Peediddy to run the operation?
And I said decades ago that anyone, utilities, mfrs,shippers, etc. that bet their lives and biznesses on lazyass use of the internet would live to regret it bigtime. Allowing an outside entity of any sort a way to effect any aspect of operations has always been seeweecidal.
I well remember my brother, a 7 million mile long haul trucker, way back in the 70’s using sat phones that could monitor a trucks performance but in no way could effect its operation. They knew better that far back.
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4227070/posts
People are installing bollards in their driveways to protect their cars from thieves in Toronto
National Post ^ | 03 25 2024 | Joshua Chang