Posted on 03/15/2024 10:01:45 PM PDT by ransomnote
I am as tired as you are with these professional “fact checkers” who try to “debunk” with BS rather than making an informed decision based on what was actually published.
Again apologies if it was confusing. Should have added the All.
No offense taken - no need for apology. I always read your posts with interest and respect your push for the truth.
Yes that’s exactly what they did. The whole thing is almost unbelievable that they would attempt a stunt like this. These people are straight up sociopaths in their disregards for the safety of others.
Some people believe there was no phase three clinical trials. That’s how bad the misinformation has become.
Pfizer’s Phase 3 clinical trial began in late July 2020 and the results were published in December 2020:
https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20201210005703/en/.
The trial enrolled 46,331 participants at 153 sites around the world in Argentina, Brazil, Turkey, South Africa and the United States. It showed 95% efficacy for preventing symptomatic COVID.
Moderna’s Phase 3 Clinical Trials:
Nov. 30, 2020— Moderna, Inc. (Nasdaq: MRNA), a biotechnology company pioneering messenger RNA (mRNA) therapeutics and vaccines conducted their Phase 3 study, known as the COVE study. It enrolled more than 30,000 participants in the U.S. and was conducted in collaboration with the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), part of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), and the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA), part of the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response at the U.S. today announced that the primary efficacy analysis resulted in a vaccine efficacy of 94.1%
You obviously never examined the data or read more than Pfizer's analysis. Pfizer wanted to hide its trial data for 75 YEARS for a reason. The truth isn't pretty.You are running and hiding. I point out devastating information which you ignore and as if speaking to yourself, engage in talking point 'discussions'.
For anyone reading this who wants to know the truth about the 'vaccines', the following article by CHristian Eliot is a good starting point.
"If that’s not alarming enough, here are other gaps in the data — in other words, there is no data to suggest safety or efficacy regarding:
- Anyone younger than age 18 or older than age 55.
- Pregnant or lactating mothers.
- Autoimmune conditions.
- Immunocompromised individuals.
- No data on transmission of COVID.
- No data on preventing mortality from COVID.
- No data on duration of protection from COVID.
In case you think I’m making this up, or want to see the actual documents sent to the FDA by Pfizer and Moderna for their Emergency Use Authorization, you can check out this, or this respectively. The data gaps can be found starting with page 46 and 48 respectively."
18 Reasons I Won’t Be Getting a COVID Vaccine
ransomnote: without data, the pharmas and their shills have been pushing the 'safe and effective' lies from day 1. I encourage everyone to read the article in full as it is in some places, just jaw dropping.
I’m sorry lowbridge. My brother lived a fairly clean life the last 40+ years, so I have no other conclusion to arrive at other than the jab. I had done the research and pretty much knew what the outcome was going to be, so had time to prepare.
I also have a daughter and her spouse who have taken the jab and are having all kinds of varied health issues currently. They are also not open to discussing the jab as being the cause (actually got thrown out of their house when I tried to bring it up). I can only pray for the best and prepare for the worse...
You are correct. I am shifting the narrative. The time was not taken on the point of the discussion. I have been distracted other developments on the COVID scene. The study by Queensland Health in Australia which challenges the concept of “long COVID” has my interest. I’m not certain if it is the last word on it. And I heard on my local station that Ivermectin was found to be effective. So far, the latest information is insufficient.
In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Scientists STUNNED by First Proofs of Contaminated DNA Getting Absorbed into Human Cells –“Sunak Better Watch Out” says Dr Bhakdi, jonrick46 wrote: |
You are correct. I am shifting the narrative. The time was not taken on the point of the discussion. I have been distracted other developments on the COVID scene. The study by Queensland Health in Australia which challenges the concept of “long COVID” has my interest. I’m not certain if it is the last word on it. And I heard on my local station that Ivermectin was found to be effective. So far, the latest information is insufficient. |
The fact that you rely upon running, hiding, changing the 'narrative' exposes you and not for the better.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.