You are correct. I am shifting the narrative. The time was not taken on the point of the discussion. I have been distracted other developments on the COVID scene. The study by Queensland Health in Australia which challenges the concept of “long COVID” has my interest. I’m not certain if it is the last word on it. And I heard on my local station that Ivermectin was found to be effective. So far, the latest information is insufficient.
| In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Scientists STUNNED by First Proofs of Contaminated DNA Getting Absorbed into Human Cells –“Sunak Better Watch Out” says Dr Bhakdi, jonrick46 wrote: |
You are correct. I am shifting the narrative. The time was not taken on the point of the discussion. I have been distracted other developments on the COVID scene. The study by Queensland Health in Australia which challenges the concept of “long COVID” has my interest. I’m not certain if it is the last word on it. And I heard on my local station that Ivermectin was found to be effective. So far, the latest information is insufficient. |
The fact that you rely upon running, hiding, changing the 'narrative' exposes you and not for the better.