But does anyone really believe that any more?
This is interesting material.
Is it supposed to be pro or anti?
Am I supposed to focus on the health effects or that it appears that it took legalization for them to address this stuff?
Just another reason not to smoke Mary Jane.
The Rockefeller drug laws were deep state. Adopting them nationally was deep state. Incarceration nation and big pharma are deep state.
They’ve done a wonderful job drugging and dumbing down the nation with or without legalizing weed.
I’ve a state license that says do as thou shall
Ok, I will come clean. Don’t use it, never used it, cant stand the smell of it, and I get a coughing fit any time I am near someone who does use it.
Last time I was put under my anesthesiologist said he had to give me the amount of fentanyl an elephant would take. I use marijuana daily. So this checks out.
Sounds like if you want them to give you more pain and knockout meds, tell them you smoke weed.
...users have a higher requirement for midazolam
I really hate this stuff, but it's a little odd that an anesthesiologist is implying that he uses it. Maybe that's still standard, but I was always under the impression that it was part of the "standard cocktail" that would be used for minor procedures that didn't require the attendance of a specialist anesthesiologist.
It's bad enough on its own, but combined with weed it sounds like a guaranteed bad trip.
I highly recommend it for migraines and neuropathy. Works better than anything I have been prescribed.
“If there is one person who you should definitely not lie to about any drug use, it’s your anesthesiologist.”
Well, duh. Like he said, ANY drug - legal or illegal, medicinal or recreational.