Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Patients express fear and uncertainty after Alabama frozen embryo ruling
The Guardian ^ | 02/21/2024

Posted on 02/21/2024 8:14:44 AM PST by BenLurkin

In a first-of-its-kind decision, the Alabama state supreme court ruled on Friday that embryos are “extrauterine children” – a term that could have widespread implications for anybody who is seeking or provides in vitro fertilization (IVF). The ruling has plunged IVF doctors and patients in Alabama into chaos and uncertainty, as they scramble to untangle the practical implications of the sweeping ruling.

...

Since each created embryo is now a person in the eyes of the law, the Alabama ruling casts multiple parts of the IVF process into legal jeopardy. Providers may no longer be able to freeze, thaw, transfer or test embryos using best medical practices. People also frequently make more embryos than they use, and it is unclear if Alabamians would be able to ever dispose of those embryos under the supreme court ruling.

...

During a typical IVF process, providers use medication to stimulate the ovaries to produce multiple eggs, which are then extracted. Experts in a laboratory fertilize the eggs with sperm to create embryos. Doctors may then transfer an embryo or two into the patient’s uterus, or freeze embryos for future use.

...

If freezing is out of the picture, experts fear that providers will be forced to transfer all created embryos to patients.

(Excerpt) Read more at theguardian.com ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: frozenchildren

1 posted on 02/21/2024 8:14:44 AM PST by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

People with these embryos will begin filing their Alabama income taxes claiming deductions for each frozen embryo.


2 posted on 02/21/2024 8:16:00 AM PST by Sgt_Schultze (When your business model depends on slave labor, you're always going to need more slaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Oh BS. They didn’t rule that it’s a “person” that’s cheap yellow propaganda journalism.

The courts ruled that an embryo has the same rights as any unborn child and, as such, the parents the embryos belonged to could sue for malpractice damages.


3 posted on 02/21/2024 8:18:03 AM PST by Skywise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sgt_Schultze; Skywise

How freezing embryos is legal in the first place is what I can’t figure out.


4 posted on 02/21/2024 9:18:20 AM PST by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire, or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

“People also frequently make more embryos than they use, and it is unclear if Alabamians would be able to ever dispose of those embryos under the supreme court ruling.”

_________________________________________________________

Dispose, eh. Sad.


5 posted on 02/21/2024 9:18:32 AM PST by jacknhoo (Luke 12:51; Think ye, that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, no; but separation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

if it’s that important, just go to a neighboring state. Enough with the whining already.


6 posted on 02/21/2024 9:23:48 AM PST by hinckley buzzard ( Resist the narrative. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson