Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Laslo Fripp; null and void

One of the airshows I went to (1980s) one of the F-4 Phantom II displays claimed a Phantom could hit Mach 2.5.

Was skeptical, thinking perhaps Mach 2.2.

Was Mach 2.5 achievable?


21 posted on 02/19/2024 7:34:16 PM PST by SaveFerris (Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the Days of Lot; They did Eat, They Drank, They Bought, They Sold ......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: SaveFerris

Many years ago I read thru the NATOPS manual (while a duty driver in the ready room) and saw the speed/altitude charts for the F4B.

Looked like a very tight corner where 2.23-2.3 was possible.

Recall a navy pilot saying if you got it up there with the temp/altitude just right, the windshield over temp light would stop the fun.


29 posted on 02/19/2024 8:06:28 PM PST by doorgunner69 (When tyranny becomes law, rebellion becomes duty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: SaveFerris

I never went Mach 2.5.

Most of our work was done at 400-500 KIAS. External tanks acted like a big speed brake. A clean Phantom at full afterburner would run out of fuel in 12 minutes, or so they say.

The F-4 set a speed record for military aircraft in the 1960’s (1602 MPH). I think the Soviets eventually bested that.


30 posted on 02/19/2024 8:09:47 PM PST by Laslo Fripp (Semper Fidelis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: SaveFerris
Was Mach 2.5 achievable?

Probably, going downhill.

31 posted on 02/19/2024 8:11:51 PM PST by gundog ( It was a bright cold day in April, and the clocks were striking thirteen. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson