Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DallasBiff

I liked Stones and Led Zeppelin the 70s. But they were not one hit wonders. I saw both and their sound was too thin. The studio versions had lots of double tracking, creating a full and legitimate sound.
But up on stage there was (obviously) no double tracking of guitars etc. So I found them boring after 15 minutes. The Who were even worse live. Due to the sparse and thin sound.

These days Stones and Who bring at least 6 touring musicians on stage with them. To try to recreate their studio tracks. !00% recreation is not needed but at least go for 75-80%


152 posted on 02/05/2024 4:13:37 PM PST by dennisw (Be positive. Every day is a new day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: dennisw
The Who were even worse live. Due to the sparse and thin sound.

You must not have seen them around 1970. That was their peak live. I liked that their live sound was more raw than the studio versions.

153 posted on 02/05/2024 4:14:53 PM PST by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson