Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Robert DeLong

Here’s a topic on the border if you’d like to discuss it.

Myself, I strongly advocate for killing armed invaders crossing our borders. They need to respect our sovereignty and stay in their own countries.

If they can’t mansge this then we should kill them to discourage any other such invaders.


4 posted on 02/03/2024 3:24:08 AM PST by MeganC (Ruzzians aren't people. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: MeganC
Not the least bit impressed, because weapons can be made of many things, including drugs. Weapons can be acquired after entry into the US also. Thus that becomes just another stupid distraction, not a viable solution.

But hey, I have a novel idea, how about we enforce immigration as defined by the Constitution & laws that we have been operating under for many years now.

Oh BTW, as much as people like you want to define as to what the topic of a thread is, that is the argument that a leftist would make. While threads may have a main overall topic, topics are not monolithic. There may indeed be relevant topics that relate to the the main topic. But the topic of Ukraine is always that of invasion, especially with you Zelenskyy/Ukraine cheerleaders which in the case of Ukraine includes Russia. Thus introducing invasion in our country, especially when our country is involved in the invasion of Ukraine by Russia, means that introducing the invasion of our nation is indeed staying on topic.

Especially when the leader of out nation is deeply involved in both invasions. They may be separate & distinct, but alas they both also contain commonalities that cannot be ignored. As such they both become legitimate topics. But it really presents a quandary into the topic, because how can you justify the leader supporting the sovereignty of one nation that he is not the leader of while ignoring the sovereignty of the nation he is the leader of. It just doesn't jibe in a rational mind. That's why you try so desperately to separate the two invasions & claim that they are off topic to the other.

Just because you do not want to talk about that invasion, does not mean it is not on topic. But then again, you really are not as smart as you mistakenly believe yourself to be, so I can understand why you fail to see that fact like you fail to see many other facts. Because the truth is you do not want to make the correlations that exist to be made, because they add a dimension you are not prepared to deal with, and they might actually present arguments that counter your arguments being made.

You see how topic work, they aren't stagnant, like your brain works, they are dynamic & complex just like the real world is. Because many things impact other things, even though we sometimes miss those correlated workings.

But simplistic people usually operate under the assumption that everything is simple, because their simple minds cannot comprehend complexity, even after they are shown the complexity.

In fact, I am willing to bet that you think I have strayed off topic yet again, but the topic you introduced was invasion. You may have desired it be limited strictly to the invasion of our nation, but the overall topic is still really invasion.

14 posted on 02/03/2024 6:05:30 AM PST by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson