Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: odawg

No, it does not take an amendment. Historians and legal experts have long argued that the framers deliberately left the vague interpretation of NBC open for courts to decide and of course that is exactly what has happened.


96 posted on 01/19/2024 8:17:55 PM PST by Responsibility2nd (A truth that’s told with bad intent, Beats all the lies you can invent ~ Wm. Blake)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies ]


To: Responsibility2nd

Nah, all it is going to take is a Trump-like anchor-baby and everyone will race to revive the constitution.


99 posted on 01/19/2024 8:24:50 PM PST by Reno89519 (It's war. No one murders and takes Americans hostage. Time to act. Declare war on Islamic Hamas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]

To: Responsibility2nd

“No, it does not take an amendment.”

Well, yes it does. You can’t find a sentence in the Constitution that says it does not take an amendment to change the Constitution. It describes the process.

“Historians and legal experts have long argued that the framers deliberately left the vague interpretation of NBC open for courts to decide and of course that is exactly what has happened.”

vague interpretation??? When the framers would haggle over ever word in it?

No, you pulled that straight out of your ass. Actually, the courts have not ever ruled on NBC.

Trump alluded to a rather definitive article written about it recently.

I was taught in college, by historians deeply schooled in history, in the 70s, what NBC was and now leftists are pretending that it is a mystery what the writers had in mind and people like you drink their KoolAid with gusto.


111 posted on 01/20/2024 5:01:48 AM PST by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson