“Born in allegiance means the parents were citizens.”
You do not get to make up your own facts! Born “in allegiance” specifically means, as it meant with natural born subject, BORN UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF THE KING. Ie, in the land where the king ruled.
I gave you extensive quotes and a link to the Supreme Court cases that discussed it in detail.
But you? You just make up your own “facts” and then blame the courts for not bowing to your totally worthless stupidity!
Can you explain why, and how, idiot, that generations of Americans were taught, in all the institutions of higher learning, that natural born meant born of citizen parents, as demonstrated directly in the Naturalization Act of 1790. Just how could all these deeply trained scholars in American history got it so wrong and idiots like you so easily got it so right.
I don’t know what is in it for you idiots. It must be that you are all from Bombay, India, and just can’t wait to have anti-American Hindu to be president.
If born in allegiance simply means born under the authority of the king, then you intend to mean that all those babies born of illegal aliens in this country are natural born citizens. It takes a complete idiot to believe that is what the Founders had in mind, when they were so strict, that citizenship only descended through the father, as spelled out in the Naturalization Act of 1790.
Also, the rules of citizenship of another country has no bearings on the rules of citizenship in this country. We have never had a king and most of our laws were written in defiance and opposition of all that goes with kingship.
Utter garbage. Just opinions based on other opinions of people who didn't know what the hell they were talking about in the first place.
Founding era documents, or nothing.
Might as well cite the Supreme court on Roe v Wade, Dred Scott, or Plessey vs Ferguson.