BIG BANG PING!................
BIG BANG FUSION PING!....................
It’s all in here.
I suppose the events documented in Genesis 1:1 could’ve made a huge bang.
The Big Bang is just something theorized by a Catholic priest.
There's apparently a reason for that:
"In 1993, theoretical cosmologist Jim Peebles criticized Alfvén–Klein cosmology, writing that "there is no way that the results can be consistent with the isotropy of the cosmic microwave background radiation and X-ray backgrounds". In his book he also showed that Alfvén's models do not predict Hubble's law, the abundance of light elements, or the existence of the cosmic microwave background. A further difficulty with the ambiplasma model is that matter–antimatter annihilation results in the production of high energy photons, which are not observed in the amounts predicted. While it is possible that the local "matter-dominated" cell is simply larger than the observable universe, this proposition does not lend itself to observational tests."
I also find it interesting that one of the reasons Alfven wanted to reject the Big Bang was that he considered it a stealth form of creationism (as he apparently believed that the universe had always existed).
I play online backgammon and sometimes play an opponent named BigBangGirl. I figure she’s either a physicist or a hooker. Haven’t asked her yet, though.
All of the effort against the Big Bang and all of the Multi-verse crap is because the Big Bang implies CREATION. This is why it gets “fairy tale” appellations all of the sudden.
Return of the God Hypothesis - Steven C. Meyer
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B07G122JJN
Meyer argues that theism—with its affirmation of a transcendent, intelligent and active creator—best explains the evidence we have concerning biological and cosmological origins. Previously Meyer refrained from attempting to answer questions about “who” might have designed life. Now he provides an evidence-based answer to perhaps the ultimate mystery of the universe. In so doing, he reveals a stunning conclusion: the data support not just the existence of an intelligent designer of some kind—but the existence of a personal God.
This is why the Big Bang had to go..
PING Electric Universe, Creation
I read the whole thing and have no clue what his new theory is.
Ban somebody state it in a paragraph or too in reasonably simple English?
Maxwell’s theory of electromagnetism was derived from 4 field equations, later converted to vector equations by self-taught Oliver Heaviside, because he hated field equations.
The other 196 of JCM’s equations were discarded by Heaviside because they were “impossible”.
Original copies of JCM’s work are either very rare or lost.
The trouble with all of these theories is that we see only a tiny part of the entire Universe because we cannot see dark matter.
If you pour a dark matter ‘beer’ into a mug, which represents the entire universe, then the foam that rises to the top is the baryonic matter which we can see.
Or a blind man finds an elephant’s tail and, from that, describes the entire animal.
Eric J Lerner looks like he has never seen daylight, yet he describes his theory of the universe.
BTTT