Ah. It is not the vaccine that causes the sarcoma, but oxidative stress due to the physical injury caused by the insertion of the needle. Any injection, regardless of the contents of the syringe, can cause this kind of injury. Cats are especially prone to this kind of injury, but even cats have a very low incidence of injection related sarcomas. The AVMA article you linked states that it occurs in one out of 10,000 to 30,000 vaccinations.
I had a cat develop a vaccine-injection site sarcoma. Because we noticed it early, we had him treated right away. He ended up having four surgeries, the last of which completely removed one of his larger leg muscles. He was a bit gimpy after that, but still lived another nine years. Oh, and he still got his annual vaccinations.
As I said, there is no biological mechanism for the natural function of the immune system to cause cancer.
If the small amount of spike mRNA contained in a vaccine dose is somehow carcinogenic, think just how carcinogenic it must be to have active virus distributed through the entire body. That virus forces cells all over the body to make not just spike mRNA, but mRNAs coding all virus proteins. If that were the case, then every single person who has survived Covid is at great risk of cancer.
I will mention that in the medical literature, I found several articles on feline injection-site sarcoma (ISS), three articles mentioning canine ISS, and one article each mentioning ISS in a ferret, a rabbit, and three weaver birds.
I get such a kick out of your assumption that you are the definitive voice. Your conclusions are not supported by the points you make but you think to dazzle with your footwork.
Other actual scientists are well aware that the relationships you cavalierly dismiss are unclear and mechanisms are unknown. Science constantly surprised with elucidation of unsuspected interrelationships but you will never be surprised because you “know”.
I think it’s sad the way you glibly mix fact & fantasy in your posts. Interestingly the incidence of post injection malignancies in cats is noted as being 1:10k to 1:1k. The veterinary literature has not caught up to you and is unaware that oxidative stress is the cause. In fact certain vaccinations are more likely than others to result in injection site neoplasms and the relationship is well established.
https://todaysveterinarypractice.com/oncology/feline-injection-site-sarcomas/
"Look, *Squirrel* !"
The clot-shots aren't vaccines, even if you vermin tried to move Heaven and Earth to insist that everyone call them that. (Maybe they should be called trans-vaccines 🤡.) And the mechanisms of tumor formation are related to the novel features of the jabs in their capacity of genetic "therapies", within cells receiving the contents ofvthe lipid nanoparticles, NOT in the supposed reaction of the immune system to the newly created spine proteins coming from those cells. Dingbat.
Dingbat here ADMITS that getting her cat injected, caused it to lost most of a leg: and yet STILL continued to have it get injections in following years.
I now begin to see a pattern in how Dingbat treats the injuries from clot-shots...