I noticed a link to this substack on another site.
It is a high level overview of Q posts…
And a good refresher on the posts and subsequent unfolding of events.
I’ve read the first two posts I am linking below.
Chapter two was good.
FYI
https://badlands.substack.com/p/q-for-dummies-chapter-1
https://badlands.substack.com/p/q-for-dummies-chapter-2
https://badlands.substack.com/p/q-for-dummies-chapter-3
As always, think and do your own due diligence…
Meant to ping you…
:: It is a high level overview of Q posts…::
Is this (”high level”) your description of the substack contents?
Is it more accurate/legitimate if it is “high level”?
Is it even better than we do here because it is “high level”?
Is it better than original Anon content found on 4chan because it is “high level”
Who defines “high level”?
“Be careful who you follow.”
“Some are profiting off this movement.”
- Q, 1314
Thanks, I got them and skimmed the first one, and will be glad to revisit and check the others out. Been very busy... BTW Dh has been having heart issues for a week or so and...taking Arjuna.