Posted on 12/14/2023 1:52:39 AM PST by nikos1121
>Smith wouldn’t have sent to USSC if he didn’t think it would be successful.<
He knew it was going there anyway. He needs this settled quickly to have any chance of affecting the election.
EC
.
Mark Levin said Wednesday night, it’s very troubling they took up Smith’s motion, and it clearly obvious - they shouldn’t have.
I don’t understand the optimism with their Track record:
best I could see happening is a 7-2 split and that doubtful
Unite the country?
I hope they do but the Left will lose their ever-loving mind
.
Roberts was in charge of the FISA court when they surveilled everyone that has known Trump as an adult. Roberts could’ve taken action, but instead did nothing after the fraudulent applications came to light.
Giving Trump’s people roughly a week to reply (and letting Smith set the Calendar) is another Red Flag.
In my humble opinion, it’s just another example of malfeasance caused by the 17th amendment. Until the 17th Amendment is repealed, our Republic restored, we are going to have a flawed judiciary and a uniparty running it’s animal called Fedzilla on us taxpayers...
“the people who rioted and destroyed property could have been Antifa or BLM or even planted agents.”
It’s more than probable. The visual information is enough, or at least it should be.
There are many Freepers that defend the 17th amendment. I kid you not.
I don’t understand the optimism with their Track record:
I agree the poster of the thread/vanity has unwarranted optimism. The bulk of the suits aren't even being considered and the way I read this thing is the SC has asked for the Trump defense teams briefs on the request just to give a speedy decision about consideration overall -- not that they have agreed to consider and/or adjudicate the matter overall.
In early 2021 poster LS points out:
There is no institution left to save us. Just as in 1860 there was not one single functioning American institution--even the church---that would speak up to stop slavery.
God may save us. Our institutions surely won't.
The Lord and a clamoring electorate is all we have to hope for and a ballot to complete.
Unfortunately, Trump is not a magician, as his first term demonstrated. Even if elected the problems are only 5% solved.
There will never be a 9 - 0 result on anything in SCOTUS associated with Trump.
The presidency is essentially neutered from now on and whatever three-part government we thought our country was founded on should be, it will cease to exist.
No president in all our history has had attacks like these made against him.
If ifs and buts were candy and nuts we’d all have a Merry Christmas.
That’s the face of a traitor, and a likely epstein pal, in my opinion.
“No Standing” to challenge an unconstitutional election.
But plenty of “Standing” to take down a duly elected President who doesn’t go along with the globalist agenda.
I’ll have what you’re having.
.
Like the DoJ, FBi, and even the National Archives, they have no problem simply flipping back and protecting other Presidents.
SCOTUS is part of DC power structure and they view Joe Biden in need of their of their protection while Donald Trump is a threat to the Deep State.
They view Jack Smith as an extension of them.
Well said. In the bigger picture that is the blunt truth of the matter.
.
Terms in DC reserved exclusively for Trump:
Election Interference
Recusal
Insurrection
Compromised
Collusion
Unethical
Raid
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.