In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 12/12/2023 Vol.482, Q Day 2236, grey_whiskers wrote: Holy crap, Cheshire! From your 2nd link:
At no point was true pharmacology of BNT162b2 ever assessed. The famous “rat distribution” study comes closest. It at least uses the same LNP construct as BNT162b2, but with RNA encoding luciferase rather than the spike protein. As openly admitted in the introduction:
https://www.tga.gov.au/sites/default/files/foi-2389-06.pdf p. 40.
At no point did Pfizer or BioNTech have any idea what their product was doing or would actually do in humans.
At no time would the CDC/FDA/NIH treat as valid evidence that the 'vaccine' was harmful because they required that those making claims of vaccine harm prove the mechanisms of action(s) (i.e., what the vaccine was doing).
I believe that Pfizer and BioNTech knew exactly what their 'vaccines' were doing, but withholding the documentation prevented researchers from making their case quickly and stopping 'vax' distribution.Fauci and Walensky both worded their advertising promotions for the 'vaccine' by saying, "We're seeing evidence that the vaccines are safe and effective..." and, at the time, they were obviously using wording from the hand of lawyers, because science doesn't base conclusions about safety/efficacy on 'some ea evidence I saw'. So those two ghouls plan to say they never saw pharma evidence based on pharma false claims that it was never studied. The dog ate their homework.
