well. after looking at this, something’s not quite right here. i think the headline doesn’t match at all with what is in the article.
it looks like the so called whistle blower’s claims are better presented in the following which was sourced in the slay thing:
https://twitter.com/myletrinh123/status/1730261477788135464
i also think this ‘Winston Smith’ guy is not going to be anonymous long if his bio in the article is right.
Thanks. Interesting. It isn’t hard to imagine some batches being contaminated or an injector at one site being bad at her job and injecting this crap into blood vessels.
Hopefully this statistician in NZ goes further and compares the number of deaths to background rates of various causes of deaths.
Characterising the background incidence rates of adverse events of special interest for covid-19 vaccines in eight countries: multinational network cohort study | The BMJ
https://www.bmj.com/content/373/bmj.n...
Largest, Most Extensive Study Of Adverse Events Background Rates Can Inform COVID Vaccines Safety Monitoring Efforts
https://www.dbmi.columbia.edu/aesi-ba...
U.S. Population-Based background incidence rates of medical conditions for use in safety assessment of COVID-19 vaccines - ScienceDirect
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science...
Adverse events following COVID‐19 mRNA vaccines: A systematic review of cardiovascular complication, thrombosis, and thrombocytopenia - PMC
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/arti...