Watch: AI analysis says US Moon landing images are fake (Google AI)

UMMID ^ | 11/27/2023 | Staff

[Diana in Wisconsin]

No way was our trip to the Moon a fake! You could NOT 'fake' something like this!

[cgbg]

The problem is that if you look at the wide range of photography and the quality it is just not feasible for astronauts (who have many other critical tasks to attend to) to make it happen.

This is not “passive photography”. One problem is that the astronaut gloves have very little dexterity to deal with tiny camera controls over lighting, direction etc.

The book I cited gets into the challenges of the Kodak cameras used—Kodak did everything they could to make it work but at the end of the day their experts knew that mediocre photos were the best could be hoped for—and there was a strong chance that many rolls of film would be damaged by radiation and temperature issues.

The large quantity of professional level clean pictures are not credible imho.

[Jane Long]

???

[Jan_Sobieski]

The Mormons believe Quakers live on the Moon 🌝! Why not their dogs too?!

[waterhill]

Know a good man from Russia, that’s their dog’s name.

[citizen]

This is another example of AI not really being “intelligent” but rather, it regurgitates the info programmed into it in a manner desired by the [leftist] programmers.

[Ol' Dan Tucker]

A computer is a computer - garbage in garbage out. The only undeniable superiority of a computer over the human brain is that it is much, much faster.

Or, in the case of AI, garbage in, gospel out.

[Jane Long]

LOL!! Or, this....

[sunny bonobo]

I don’t think I would trust a “Kodak Technician” who didn’t know that the cameras on the moon missions were Hasselblads, not Kodak. Kodak made the film.

[cgbg]

The film was kinda important—lol.

[sunny bonobo]

Why are you citeing a book that doesn’t know that the cameras were Hasselblads, not Kodak???
How can anything else in the book be believed if they got such a basic fact wrong?

[JPG]

There are real problems in the world and these bozo's have time for such foolishness as fake moon landings. It would be thousands of times more difficult to fake it than just to do it.

I was there for every second of the space program and followed it all in amazement.

[clearcarbon]

"[Google AI anslysis found that the U.S. Moon photos are fake, but thought images captured by Chines lunar rover are fine.]"

[Diana in Wisconsin]

Exactly. That’s what I’m talkin’ about! :)

[Dr. Sivana]

Where’s Alice Kramden?

[telescope115]

Right you are. ALSO, Apollo 15 proved that a hammer and a feather DO drop at the same speed in a vacuum. Proved Galileo right.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SEZsIfX7xuc

[sunny bonobo]

You’re just totally wrong. The controls were NOT tiny. They were enlarged to deal with the gloves. Why would gloves interfere with “direction” as you say.You just point the camera in the direction you want to shoot.

[Openurmind]

How did the White House get in Biden’s basement?

Are we sure the flag is actually there?

[sunny bonobo]

The film was kinda important—lol.
****************
You were complaining about the cameras, not the film. Don’t try to deflect. LOL

[Robert DeLong]

Now I am not saying it doesn't exist on the moon, but I can't say that it does exist on the moon either, because I have never personally been to the moon to verify or deny its existence.

Have you? 🙂